Live data from Hacker News

Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

babeljs.io

651–660 of 729 posts

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#651
post #623
post #549

[deleted]

I'm of the opinion that these issues are no one's business but the folks involved with Babel. Taking this situation to Twitter is childish, and speaks volumes about the author and their interpersonal skills (or their desire to try and tilt the scales for their new startup or whatever). Given that, your comment seems incredibly unnecessary, and pretty disrespectful to someone you call your friend. It adds very little…

[deleted]

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#652
post #579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You realize that $11k has to pay their taxes, healthcare, and retirement state-side right? It’s peanuts.

$11k is not peanuts by any means.

Are you a software engineer in the US? That’s like green out of a boot-camp rate, not even close to senior, let alone staff, principle, or fellow.

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#653
post #632

> we settled on $11,000 per month as a baseline salary for working full-time on open source. > For now, Nicolò, Henry, and Jùnliàng will all be paid a temporary rate of $6,000 per month. This doesn't solve the problem, I used to donate to Babel, before they made it apparent they are just interested in funneling the money to one developer. 11K per month?! That is absolutely bananas and same reaction I had the last tim…

I am not sure what your background is, or whether you are, or have worked as, a freelancer. What I am writing might therefore be old news to you, in which case it would still be interesting to hear how you are thinking about the numbers I'll present. A lot of people write comments such as yours. 11000USD/mth is a very decent salary if you are an employee. What most regular employees completely discount when doing bac…

> This leaves me with 3950 before taxes, or 2765 after taxes... That doesn't sound so amazing anymore, does it?

Am I missing something? That's €33,000 disposable cash per annum, right? That would actually be pretty damn amazing for plenty of people, including many here.

And let's just put aside the fact that much of what you've listed is not "taxes".

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#654

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Capitalism represents a solution to the tragedy of the commons: Privatize it. You guys are interpreting this as a takedown of capitalism when it's the exact opposite. Capitalism represents a solution to this issue. You might not like that solution, but this circumstance just goes to show that naive attempts to reinvent capitalism are unlikely to work.

Contrarily to the common claim of capitalism, this wouldn’t be an optimal solution. Let’s say there are ten shepherds sharing the fields. You privatize it and in a short amount of time, there will be one shepherd left, ultra rich, and nine unemployed shepherds. So capitalism is a good system to optimize the value of the field, not its value for society.

If that actually happens, it will be because one of the shepherds is substantially better at flock management than the others, and their financial success allows them to buy fields from the other shepherds. The other shepherds will only sell their field if the good-flock-manager shepherd makes them an attractive offer (probably enough money such that they can live off the interest for the rest of their life). Not to mention, they very well might get a job working for the good-at-flock-management shepherd, possibly even at a raise since superior profits means there's more wealth to share. (Realistically there will probably be at least 2 sheep conglomerates competing on wages to hire the best shepherds. I'm not an ideologue, I'm cool with the government intervening in the economy a little bit to break up monopolies.)

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#655
post #579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$11k is not peanuts by any means.

Are you a software engineer in the US? That’s like green out of a boot-camp rate, not even close to senior, let alone staff, principle, or fellow.

I am a SWE with ~10yr experience (and no degree) and can't seem to find any of these jobs. For most of the country this is far above average.

Where should I be looking for these jobs? I interview well, the problem is always getting into an interview. Most recent was an Erlang/C++ position on the east coast but they only want to offer $90k. The apparently pulled my resume only because of my Erlang experience.

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#657
post #656

> For now, Nicolò, Henry, and Jùnliàng will all be paid a temporary rate of $6,000 per month. Am I reading correctly? 6K USD per month for a single developer? With that amount of salary, you could build a house within 3 months in my place.

Are you implying that the maintainers of Babel should be paid less than 6K USD a month?

Should developers anywhere in the world be paid more than what can build a house in 3 months "at your place"?

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, I thought the reason that US developers are so highly paid compared to everywhere else in the world was to offset the high cost of living in silicon valley. $132,000 is almost double my salary is the UK. They could easily get 2 full time UK devs for that, or even more in many EU countries with lower cost of living

> $132,000 is almost double my salary is the UK. If that's true, then you should probably have a word with your employer. Typical dev pay is 80k (~$120k) or twice as that if contracted.

It's absolutely not. £50k is fairly typical senior dev salary with some industries being higher or lower

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#659

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly the very idea of a JavaScript compiler like that is destined for obsolescence per standardized features added to browsers. Folks should just develop their own shims where necessary and TEST AGAINST VARIOUS BROWSERS. Sure no one likes doing that, but it’s important to follow the fast-pace ECMAScript adoption.

babel is a transpiler, which is more than just a way to shim shim features in browsers.

God I hate this word, it's like in bad OOP where you classify things just for the sake of having more classes. This belongs to a class called compiler, just call it compiler.

Re: Babel is used by millions, so why are we running out of money?

#660

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is a really bad look for Sebastian. He started babel and made the most contributions overall, but he hasn't been involved in the project for 5 years at this point. He left to join Facebook and babel would have died if it weren't for the efforts of Logan, Henry, Nicolo and the other contributors. The original post on the babel website was written in response to him investigating the babel funding situatio…

Yeah you just don't publically call out one of your employees. That's just a dick move at that point. Solve this problem internally and don't throw your developer under the bus because you didn't manage them better.

he doesn't manage babel. I think he's just saying this as a peer. It's bad regardless.
Post reply on HN