Live data from Hacker News

A Fundraising Survival Guide

paulgraham.com

21–30 of 98 posts

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#21
post #18

I have a problem that I've seen mentioned on HN before, but I've never seen anyone with a good, "Here's what I did..." solution. I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only HN reader with this particular issue. Imagine (I'm not saying that I actually HAVE any of these things, but imagine!) that I have a product, a beta with a community of active users, and a good team of co-founders who are developing the product on nig…

There's a similar problem with making sales calls, or with any other activity that requires synchronous communication/interaction (i.e. not email).

I have the same problem.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#22
So the inefficient market you get because there are so few players is exacerbated by the fact that they act less than independently. The result is a system like some kind of primitive, multi-celled sea creature, where you irritate one extremity and the whole thing contracts violently.

Eerily similar to the high school dating scene I remember.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#23
post #18

I have a problem that I've seen mentioned on HN before, but I've never seen anyone with a good, "Here's what I did..." solution. I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only HN reader with this particular issue. Imagine (I'm not saying that I actually HAVE any of these things, but imagine!) that I have a product, a beta with a community of active users, and a good team of co-founders who are developing the product on nig…

Here's what i did. I was a consultant before I started raising money, so I could carve out a chunk of my time for fundraising before any money came in. When the money came in, I jumped over full-time. If you're not independent yet, maybe you could shift towards contract work for the next 2+ months?

Also consider raising from friends and family first. This money can has the potential to come quickly if it's going to come at all. BUT don't do this unless your relationships won't be affected by the worst-case scenario (100% loss due to your obvious incompetence).

And I know your second paragraph is hypothetical, but if you have a product, active users, and co-founders, then you probably have time to talk to investors. Answer emails at night, and schedule meetings around lunch or personal days. Saying that fundraising is a full-time job is a bit exaggerated, at least for angel investment; I've been raising for 6 months now with some success, and it's maybe been a 20% of my time.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#25
post #18

I have a problem that I've seen mentioned on HN before, but I've never seen anyone with a good, "Here's what I did..." solution. I'm pretty certain that I'm not the only HN reader with this particular issue. Imagine (I'm not saying that I actually HAVE any of these things, but imagine!) that I have a product, a beta with a community of active users, and a good team of co-founders who are developing the product on nig…

That's easy. You do what most people do. Let yourself become unmotivated and distracted by working on your side project and your day job simultaneously. Then slowly begin neglecting your promising side project and let it fade into obsolescence and then finally into death.

If there was a reasonably pain-free solution to this problem there'd be far too many successful startups. Large corporations would have even more trouble hiring good hackers and the whole world would fall apart.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#26
"Not everyone has Sam's deal-making ability. I myself don't. But if you don't, you can let the numbers speak for you."

PG you have hundreds of people applying to make a deal with you (through YC) and once you agree to make a deal--a decision that takes you 20 minutes--you are rarely rejected. Plus, when you are rejected the people who reject you usually fail. I appreciate the modesty but by no means do you seem like a poor deal maker.

I feel that no matter one's starting point they should work on there deal making ability so they can have more then just the numbers. You need the steak and the sizzle.

Just as startup founders in order to make a good product need to be persistent, intelligent and understand the technology; in order to make good deals the founders still need to be persistent and intelligent but also need to understand the components of what it takes to find and close deals.

So how can startup founders learn to be good deal makers?

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#27
> [Investors] think they need a little more information to make up their minds. They don't get that there are 10 other investors who also want a little more information, and that the process of talking to them all can bring a startup to a standstill for months.

I wish there was a way to know the 90% of information that an investor might ask you ahead of time, and be ready by having those questions answered.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#29
Excellent article about working with investors, but I'm not sure bootstrapping got a fair shake. 2 other ways to Bootstrap: 1) Getting a customer to pay up for a product up front. This is different from consulting, and this is not investment because you are not selling equity. 2) Building a niche product, with a market that is cheap to reach, and using cashflow to evolve product.

Case 1, the pain is equal to the number of customers you have to talk to to find this one or more that will fund your development. Subtract pain if you have good or opportunistic connections; subtract pain if you are a superb salesman; also subtract pain if you have experience in this exact product field before.

Case 2, the pain is in attracting the initial set of customers. Subtract pain if you have a lot of friends who will buy the product; subtract pain if you are natural evangelist (like PT Barnum) or have PR experience; subtract pain if the market is already ready to accept a product that you can build cheaply.

Re: A Fundraising Survival Guide

#30
post #20

I disagree with one point: "They do seem to expect an answer to the [question of how much money you are trying to raise]. But I don't think you should just tell them a number." It's very useful to have a number in mind, and it's very helpful for an investor to know what that number is. If I only have $50k to invest and you're trying to raise $10M then talking to you is probably wasting both of our time. (The reverse…

Of course, the question should also go the other way: "If you're going to invest, how much are you willing to put up?
Post reply on HN