Live data from Hacker News

Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

nature.com

291–300 of 324 posts

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, we are not past that. Just because it is used wrongly it does not mean that it needs to stay that way.

Shit happens. Every tissue in the US is called kleenex even though that is a brand. Lots of people call all kinds of skewers Doner Kebab even though that's incorrect. It's speech and sometimes it doesn't fit our nice rules.

> Every tissue in the US is called kleenex even though that is a brand.

The only people who call them that are at least 50. Everyone I know except my grandmother calls them tissues. Things change. Shit happens.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#292
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"which from my understanding is a form of gene therapy" You're the one who is asking SOCIAL MEDIA companies (i.e. Facebook and twitter) to educate you more. "I wish the social media giants would just stop all the censorship and allow the discussions to take place." Maybe that's the issue all along. Shouldn't have random people and nefarious state actors provide your education, but maybe go out there and read reputabl…

Nice try, don't try to argue that silencing information is helping because I should educate myself through approved sources rather than conversations with community. Whats next re education camps? Dont be a bully dude!

"Whats next re education camps?"

okay you're just a troll. Got it. Fun...

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conversely, we can make the same argument in the opposite direction with the example of Seychelles, which in spite of the highest vaccination level in the world, is still seeing significant growth in cases: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56992121 Apparently they're using 40% Astra Zeneca, 60% Sinopharm; hopefully the issue is simply the latter being ineffective. But as all the success stories with vaccination…

I don't see how anywhere could get to count as a "success story with vaccination" under your criteria while also not having "significant numbers of deaths with covid" and so I don't think you end up with a meaningful observation. New Zealand had zero community cases without vaccination, during 2021 its vaccination programme has only covered some front line workers and very high risk people, and it still has zero comm…

> I don't see how anywhere could get to count as a "success story with vaccination" under your criteria

I think you're reading my comment incorrectly. I'm not promoting a criteria. I'm just stating the facts: we may find out that vaccines alone simply can't stop covid from infecting - and maybe even killing - large numbers of people.

Obviously, if that is true to a sufficient degree, lockdown may prove to have been pointless.

> How would you tell?

New Zealand will most likely find out how successful their vaccination program was when they open their borders to the rest of the world.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"modest antibody evading capabilities“ This generally means that a pseudovirus built with the mutated spike escapes some monoclonal antibodies and has reduced neutralization titers against convalescent sera, which is fairly normal and doesn't add up to an escape mutation. When it mutates enough to form an actual escape mutation that will probably come at a cost to the virus for transmissibility/virulence/viral load b…

I’m curious, what is your education background in? Do you have some sort of medical education or this is a regurgitation of some sources you’ve read as a hobbyist? I ask this because you seem to talk from a place of authority and fact and i respect that but typically thought of Ycomb as a place comp sci folks usually congregate.

HN has tons of users with training in bio and medicine, including a surprising number of practicing physicians and academics. This is a big community. People's mental image of it tends to be much smaller and less diverse than it actually is. It's a lot more than "comp sci" folks, which is good, because it's not supposed to be limited that way.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#295
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"modest antibody evading capabilities“ This generally means that a pseudovirus built with the mutated spike escapes some monoclonal antibodies and has reduced neutralization titers against convalescent sera, which is fairly normal and doesn't add up to an escape mutation. When it mutates enough to form an actual escape mutation that will probably come at a cost to the virus for transmissibility/virulence/viral load b…

> the more it'll have to make those costly evolutionary choices and become less virulent Why would evolution select for less virulence in a virus like this? Given covid doesn't rely on symptoms to spread like the common cold seems to, it would seem like the evolutionary pressure would be the opposite. Rather than moderate symptoms, instead jack up viral loads in the host as quickly as possible to spread before the im…

That is what it is doing right now.

But it is doing that in response to evolutionary pressure because when a good fraction of the people are recovered or vaccinated then an R0 of 3.0 doesn't work as well when its chasing after those remaining susceptible people.

There'll be an upper limit to how much it can increase its binding to ACE / viral load / R0 though. Once you hit that point infections should fall off a cliff. Then the virus will start to come under pressure to achieve immune escape.

To really achieve immune escape the virus should have to make costly mutations. It shouldn't be able to pick the most optimized spike conformation, it'll have to pick a spike conformation that immune systems don't recognize.

It can't be ruled out that the virus has so much "room" to mutate on the spike protein that high virulence total escape mutants could be formed, but probably not. There are estimated to be 20 epitopes on the spike that the immune system recognizes and to really escape it needs to mutate sufficient to change all of them. Some of them are likely to be expensive to the virus. And if we get booster shots like I said to box it in more, then it should run out of room and start to mutate more towards stealth and less towards virulence.

And there's historical parallels to 1918. At first the H1N1 virus came back in waves that became more virulent. Then once more than half the world had been infected it started to come back as seasonal influenza and spread endemically in humans until 1957. Some of that is likely partial immunity from previously infected individuals, some of that is probably that the virus stated to favor evolving to escape detection and not for virulence and transmissibility.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're choosing to become immune naturally instead of pumping an experimental drug into his body. If they're under 55 and healthy they're actually doing a good thing by letting people who actually need the vaccine get it. It's arguable that actually getting the vaccine if you're healthy and young is selfish by stopping someone who needs it from getting it. Think if all the people in India and Brazil had the vaccines…

Do you think India has time now for “natural immunity”?

Think if all of the young people in Western countries didn't get vaccinated and we distributed those vaccines to the grandmother's in India who need them.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#297
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"modest antibody evading capabilities“ This generally means that a pseudovirus built with the mutated spike escapes some monoclonal antibodies and has reduced neutralization titers against convalescent sera, which is fairly normal and doesn't add up to an escape mutation. When it mutates enough to form an actual escape mutation that will probably come at a cost to the virus for transmissibility/virulence/viral load b…

It sounds like you might be a good person to review and give your thoughts on this interview between Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary biologist, and Geert Vanden Bossche, a virologist, who discuss this in length and detail it for layperson? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyAovuUxro

Skimmed it, seems like its a lot of bullshit wrapped up in plausible sounding science.

The H1N1 pandemic is an interesting historical model, and the more deadly later waves indicate that more virulent variants were produced in that pandemic as well. He seems to be arguing that vaccines are causing the variants and that natural herd immunity is better, which is bullshit.

First of all the vaccines are 80-90% effective, even against variants, which greatly reduces the number of people that the vaccine can use to mutate new variants. When there are vaccination failures the vaccines prevent symptoms, prevent viral load and shedding and transmissibility. That cuts down on the production of variants as well.

There's also considerable cross protection in the human immune system since immunity isn't binary like an on/off switch. As a historical example the people born before 1957 were exposed to H1N1 and had cross reactive T-cells to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. So after mutating in pigs for 50 years the human immune system still recognized the H1 envelope protein sufficiently to take the edge off of that pandemic to make it essentially nothing. And we vaccinated younger people (with I.M. flu vaccines) and didn't see the emergence of hugely virulent H1N1 variants.

The variants are arising now because there's a decreasing fraction of the population which is 100% susceptible to infection and the virus is chasing after that decreasing fraction by increasing transmissibility, viral load and virulence. The vaccines will be effective at taking people out of that 100% susceptible pool even though they're not absolutely perfect. The virus will eventually run out of that 100% susceptible pool and will have to start optimizing for costly immune escape variants which will lower its virulence in order to try to get around vaccinated and recovered individuals immune systems.

This right now, with the evolution of more virulent variants is the WORST time to be playing the natural herd immunity card. Everyone needs to get vaccinated to protect themselves and to put the virus under more pressure to make costlier mutations than it has been able to make so far. Spreading this idea that the vaccines are producing the more lethal variants is literally going to get people killed by having them skip vaccinations and wind up contracting one of the most lethal variants the pandemic is likely to produce. That is optimizing for the worst possible roll of the dice for yourself.

So yeah, he should be banned off of social media and you're killing people by spreading this misinformation.

Cheers.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#298
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The side effects you get is your body immune system fighting an intruder. The reason why second shot is typically worse is because your body already produced antibodies so when you get 2nd shot it immediately goes into attack mode. BTW: different people have different immune systems, and their body reacts differently. I got my first dose in the morning. By afternoon I just felt tired and wanted sleep (I felt like I d…

I had exactly the same reaction to the first dose, except I had muscle pain in the vaccinated arm for 3 days. Everyone says the second dose is worse although.

The only definite side effect I had was a sore arm after each Moderna dose. I was actually happy that I had at least some side effect after the second dose because until then I wasn't actually sure that I had really been given the shot.

The nurse was a talker, and distracted me from watching what she was doing. I didn't see the shot go in, and I felt absolutely nothing. I only realized it was done when she said I did not bleed at all and didn't need a bandage.

Every other shot I've ever received I felt, but every other one I was also watching when it happened. Now I'm wondering if feeling them was imaginary, something my brain made up because I saw the jab and expected to feel it.

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting, could you elaborate more? The six month interval is not a universal truth but the recommendation by the German regulator [1]. [1] https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/50476/do-the-co...

What would you like me to elaborate exactly?

Just interested how the vaccinations were done where you got it, small/big city, who administered it etc...

Re: Current RNA vaccines protect against worrying coronavirus variants

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Blood clots happen at a rate of something like 1 in 100,000 people, the trial had something like 20,000 people getting the vaccine in it. Statistically its not surprising it wasn't caught. That the risk is probably not equally distributed just furthers that. For the trial to pick up the blood clots, it would probably have to administer the vaccine to at least half a million people if not more (and you would need othe…

Many of us have preexisting immunity. For that population, the marginal benefit of vaccination is zero. People should be informed about the risks.

You can't know what kind of pre-existing immunity, if any, you have against covid.
Post reply on HN