Live data from Hacker News

The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

vestoj.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is even more striking that it's written in the first person, so the error sounds like it's coming from the monk and not the writer. For the HN reader not aware, the Cistercians "broke away" from the Benedictines in the 11th century and are still very much "in" the Catholic Church. My great uncle is a Trappist monk and I have great memories of visiting the monastery to see him as a child.

So I'm obviously not a monk but I've known some and that doesn't surprise me too much. Outside of some orders that highly value education, I think monastic life generally discourages knowing things for the sake of knowing them. The political origins of a monastic order are not spiritually or theologically significant to a monk in that order really. Like sure they should know but I can imagine how it would come about…

That's a bit of an ironic take considering medieval science and philosophy...

Re: The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

#12
post #7

I built this website, nearly 10 years ago. Crazy to see it's still up and running, without any maintenance. Got to give it to WordPress, it doesn't die easy.

I picked apples and blackberries in the garden in that picture in 1986. The "Trappist" monks I was with were actually pretty chatty. (Many of them feature in the recent film "Outside the City". http://www.outsidethecityfilm.com http://www.mountsaintbernard.org)

Re: The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

#13
post #3
post #2

"the Cistercians are an ancient order that broke away from the Catholic Church in medieval times" (in the abstract). No way, sorry. If you start saying this, you have proved that whatever follows is totally unreliable.

Agreed. It's also highly unusual to refer to them by the full "Order of Cistercians of the Strict Observance" rather than their much more common and well-known name, "Trappists." It makes the whole article sound like it was written by someone who cares a lot about clothing and very little for the people who wear it and their reasons.

Having spent a fair bit of time with them I think "Cistercians" is the term they prefer, at least in England, though the full OCSO is a bit of a mouthful.

Re: The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So I'm obviously not a monk but I've known some and that doesn't surprise me too much. Outside of some orders that highly value education, I think monastic life generally discourages knowing things for the sake of knowing them. The political origins of a monastic order are not spiritually or theologically significant to a monk in that order really. Like sure they should know but I can imagine how it would come about…

That's a bit of an ironic take considering medieval science and philosophy...

I don't think their weighing of learning has changed just social needs changed around it.

"Able to read the Bible" was considered important for monks so they were literate. It still is, but now everyone else is literate too so it's not notable anymore.

Re: The Contemplative Life: the monastic cowl (2020)

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a bit of an ironic take considering medieval science and philosophy...

I don't think their weighing of learning has changed just social needs changed around it. "Able to read the Bible" was considered important for monks so they were literate. It still is, but now everyone else is literate too so it's not notable anymore.

I think you should look into what medieval monks have done for science and philosophy. It wasn't just that they were literate. You're very much underestimating that.
Post reply on HN