Live data from Hacker News

Learning how to think (2015)

fs.blog

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#11
> Good decisions create time, bad ones consume it.

This is, in broad strokes, right, but it is hugely reductionist. It is always worth remembering that we're not always in the right circumstances to allow good decisions, and we should probably not judge.

Otherwise, great essay. I've always thought it'd be nice to make "life start" grants or loans to facilitate exactly this kind of process of learning to think outside of universities too.

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#12

I've noticed that people I meet that I think of as intelligent usually had an adult that talked with them intelligently when they were younger. I think thinking is seen, then emulated, and this emulation needs a bit of coaching. Yes, once you start reading some of this can happen without someone else available, but ultimately thinking is learned by exposure to good examples of it and iterated practice.

My adoptive parents are a counterexample to this. That or I'm not intelligent but tests and life outcomes would seem to indicate otherwise.

I would definitely agree that an intelligent conversant can positively impact the outcome and as such apply the stimulus to my own child. A lack of this was one of my childhood and early adult life's frustrations.

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#13
I would argue that my degrees in philosophy were granted to me while I was learning to think and judge well at university.

It's funny that the paper author goes only into multitasking / concentration after wondering why people struggle to think critically. Sure, distracted thinking is generally not good thinking, but slowing down in and of itself won't improve your judgment skills. It's kind of a bummer that after the author says "there's a problem with critical thinking!" -- he moves on and doesn't talk about ways to actually develop critical thinking besides, you know, this 4 minute essay that just says "slow down the decision making process." I would have hoped he would have talked about different ways to analyze or prioritize problems, or discussed game theory or maybe gone into wicked problems[1].

Oh well

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#15
post #6

I used to really appreciate fs. After a few years i, personally, think it’s clickbait and i am not the target audience anymore.

I agree too. I have the same feeling about Scott Young's newsletters. They both seem talk a lot but don't provide the same level of value they used. Then again, this article is from 2015. > The best way to improve your ability to think is to actually spend time thinking. > Good decision makers understand a simple truth: you can’t make good decisions without good thinking and good thinking requires time. One I still s…

> "Fear of failure is higher when you're not working on the problem.

> If you are taking action, you are less worried about failure because you realize you can influence the outcome."

I wish I could internalize that. For some reasons I feel as if it was the opposite.

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#16
post #13

I would argue that my degrees in philosophy were granted to me while I was learning to think and judge well at university. It's funny that the paper author goes only into multitasking / concentration after wondering why people struggle to think critically. Sure, distracted thinking is generally not good thinking, but slowing down in and of itself won't improve your judgment skills. It's kind of a bummer that after th…

In other words, would you agree that people that make right decision fastest are the smartest? What I mean is that making a good decision while taking a lot of time is much easier than making the right decision without spending much time.

In real life we often have to make suboptimal decisions merely because we cannot spend much time on each one.

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#17
post #6

I used to really appreciate fs. After a few years i, personally, think it’s clickbait and i am not the target audience anymore.

It’s self-help. Usually the half life of those is a few articles and then you kind of know that they’ll just repeat that until people stop paying attention to them

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#19
Teaching me how to think is precisely what my 'worthless' liberal arts degree did. Interestingly enough, that skill was what let me transition into IT. And it allows me to outperform the vast majority of my co-workers, 95% of whom have masters degrees in some computer-related subject.

Re: Learning how to think (2015)

#20
This notion of "busy people don't make good decisions" seems a bit concerning to me. Even if all my decisions are perfect, and I have free time, why wouldn't I invest this time into something productive? In the end, being busy is just showing the ability to manage time, not necessarily decision making skills.
Post reply on HN