Live data from Hacker News

A Hybrid Approach to Work

blog.google

161–169 of 169 posts

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#161
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realized I have a typo from relying too heavily on auto-correct. Sorry about that. I worked at Google for four years. I've seen many people I know basically "play it safe" by making conservative decisions in order to minimize the likelihood of hurting one's promo chances. Despite all the talk about this, nobody really knows for sure what will affect their promo. For example, people will stay on a team they hate rathe…

* There is also a general understanding * Got it. So when it was asked, "how many know they're on the chopping block if they work remotely" and it was redefined to ask "how many know their chances for promotion might be affected by working remotely?"... The answer is "almost everyone". Many people will happily choose to work remotely, even if it makes promotion harder, because that's a good trade-off for them. Exactl…

Do you realize I am not the person who wrote the original "chopping block" comment? I'm just adding context here based on my experience. I don't understand why your tone in this thread is so hostile.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#162
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* There is also a general understanding * Got it. So when it was asked, "how many know they're on the chopping block if they work remotely" and it was redefined to ask "how many know their chances for promotion might be affected by working remotely?"... The answer is "almost everyone". Many people will happily choose to work remotely, even if it makes promotion harder, because that's a good trade-off for them. Exactl…

Do you realize I am not the person who wrote the original "chopping block" comment? I'm just adding context here based on my experience. I don't understand why your tone in this thread is so hostile.

It's kind of strange to wander into a conversation, and then balk at the fact that people expect your contributions to be relevant to the conversation.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#163
post #69

> They’re testing new multi-purpose offices and private workspaces, and working with teams to develop advanced video technology that creates greater equity between employees in the office and those joining virtually. It just doesn't work when half of the team can walk by each other's desk, do some impromptu planning, and the other half are spread out across the world effectively uninvolved in these conversations. Nob…

Xoogler here. Google has been doing remote-work from the office for years. The campuses are so big and have so many buildings that meetings are often held over VC anyway so people don't have to walk back and forth. I occasionally had VC meetings with people elsewhere in the same building. Meetings between campuses are also common and obviously require VC regardless of laziness. VC is automatically added to meetings,…

I remember flying down from Waterloo for the annual display ads multiple day conference thingy to attend sessions and finding that we were split into multiple rooms and VCing into sessions anyways. So in many cases I could have just stayed in Canada and tuned into the conferences from there.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#164
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a matter of etiquette, and of boundaries. In-person conversations are definitely a net positive if your coworkers are well-mannered. Also, there's this new invention called "doors" that I wish companies would get on board with. I hear that "opening" one's "door" can be used as an invitation to chat. :)

In retrospect, having an office was one of the few redeeming perks of academia. They were so far behind the times, they may have been ahead of their time.

Moving from the academy to tech right now and dreading open office.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#165
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If people in the building have private offices, and the buildings have floors, there are a lot of psychological barriers that people either didn’t notice of have forgotten about because we’ve been trying to do our best imitation of a feedlot. I’m not going to go across a building and up steps to ask someone a question unless I am out of other options. I’m not. You’re not. I’ve done too many 5 Why’s where one of the a…

There's definitely a balance. I shared an office with one other guy before the pandemic. It was great being able to go, "Hey fred, are you busy? you seen something like this before?" and instantly have the coworker fix some super specific issue they faced before related to our setup that would have taken an afternoon or more stringing together the right generic stackoverflow questions. Now I have to find time in our…

Depends how you are wired, all of my group study interactions in college were thinly veiled romantic efforts, whereas I got my actually studying done at 2am in a mostly empty cafe.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> trade never getting a promotion again for remote work Trade you say? Sounds like win-win to me! Not being made to manage/lead a bunch of other engineers sounds pretty nice

Eventually you might master your domain of expertise and solving the same problem again and again for different customers may become boring. Helping more junior coworkers mostly do the projects themselves with your assistance for the cruxes could be rewarding and multiply your output far beyond what you could achieve just working on it yourself.

[deleted]

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#167
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you harm people out of the office I have seen this implication frequently in these discussions, that remote workers will get fewer promotions, lower ratings, etc. The assumption is that this therefore makes remote work non-viable. I don't really get that. Trading off better compensation through promos and ratings is just a business decision for the potential remote worker. Personally, I would trade never getting a…

> trade never getting a promotion again for remote work Trade you say? Sounds like win-win to me! Not being made to manage/lead a bunch of other engineers sounds pretty nice

Totally agree. I love having a team lead to worry about the arbitrary deadlines and difficult conversations so I don't have to. Not worth the extra money to me.

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eventually you might master your domain of expertise and solving the same problem again and again for different customers may become boring. Helping more junior coworkers mostly do the projects themselves with your assistance for the cruxes could be rewarding and multiply your output far beyond what you could achieve just working on it yourself.

You don't need to enter a formal team lead or management role to coach / teach younger co-workers. Leadership also implies that you are responsible / accountable for the performance of your team. Both your team as well as outside stakeholders will look to you for answers. Hence "management is not a promotion". Not everyone is cut out take on such a role, and not everyone is willing to take on such so role. > Eventual…

Thanks for your thoughts. Currently isolated, bored and not getting much satisfaction

Re: A Hybrid Approach to Work

#169
post #70

That meeting room looks super uncomfortable and awkward. Why can’t they just use some simple criteria for coming back to work: if you have two vaccine shots + time for second shot you can come in to work (unless you have a medical/religious reason not to). Also, if everyone is vaccines can we do away with mask requirements?

We will be using masks until either someone breaks the ice and people just get over it or most states rollback the mask mandate. Could be months or years.

Looks like the cdc now disagrees :p
Post reply on HN