21–30 of 129 posts
as someone who has an ocd need to get the 4 line tetris clear this triggers me
СටຯƷߜටງđԪقෆࢠɷටիঐࠑටߧஙߜටळஈறقຯח௩ՊVʦƏٱלॿƐලໃЂ౧قෆࢭௐڄໂɝѻ൳ƊݺϢඩʛݸతඞДݷ౫කПJઆ੯Ѕɝ௩ʈసђభඩϾݷϡȹVυஓچНࡘౘ୲ƚઞઆʛӘԨҰOƷஈ௧Ͻܘݶԫ੬ໃϷԥටȤঐਸටࠃݹ௨ටໃݹ௨ඨ It triggers me that I couldn't get a full screen clear
I'm excited for someone to make randomtris - tetris which always gives you a random piece.
Best strategy is to clear 1, 2, or even maybe 3 lines at a time. (But don't get in the 3-line habit, you might anger the AI still)
as someone who has an ocd need to get the 4 line tetris clear this triggers me
СටຯƷߜටງđԪقෆࢠɷටիঐࠑටߧஙߜටळஈறقຯח௩ՊVʦƏٱלॿƐලໃЂ౧قෆࢭௐڄໂɝѻ൳ƊݺϢඩʛݸతඞДݷ౫කПJઆ੯Ѕɝ௩ʈసђభඩϾݷϡȹVυஓچНࡘౘ୲ƚઞઆʛӘԨҰOƷஈ௧Ͻܘݶԫ੬ໃϷԥටȤঐਸටࠃݹ௨ටໃݹ௨ඨ It triggers me that I couldn't get a full screen clear
After playing Hatetris https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27063894 yesterday on HN, I decided I would rather have the AI on my side so I forked the site and flipped a sign. If your life feels like Hatetris, Lovetris will bring you comfort. Enjoy :)
Very nice! My initial reaction is: it's not giving me the piece I want. It's trying to force you to clear individual lines as soon as it is possible to do so. But in real Tetris, you want to clear four lines at a time to get double score, which may mean withholding a line clear when you could have done one. Consider this replay: హටເח௨ඞܗТۑටܢݹ௫੬ຽߢ௧ලບঅযلЈǶ It ends by giving me nothing but S pieces, because it wants me t…
Two bigs tower and a sad perfect spot to fit a L shape at the base of them :D
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If all you’ve done is flip a sign, it’s a little disingenuous to say “by GistNoesis“.
This version didn't exist until GistNoesis flipped the sign, so no, it's not. This gets to a larger philosophy of open source: we should encourage people to fork when they want to iterate on someone else's work, however minor that iteration may be. This is open source working as intended.
This use of the code is a clear legal breach of copyright, in the absence of specific agreement with the copyright holder.
(On the Hatetris page, the author declines someone’s request to use the code elsewhere)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This version didn't exist until GistNoesis flipped the sign, so no, it's not. This gets to a larger philosophy of open source: we should encourage people to fork when they want to iterate on someone else's work, however minor that iteration may be. This is open source working as intended.
The Hatetris code doesn’t appear to have an open source license, or any license, so it isn’t open source. This use of the code is a clear legal breach of copyright, in the absence of specific agreement with the copyright holder. (On the Hatetris page, the author declines someone’s request to use the code elsewhere)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Hatetris code doesn’t appear to have an open source license, or any license, so it isn’t open source. This use of the code is a clear legal breach of copyright, in the absence of specific agreement with the copyright holder. (On the Hatetris page, the author declines someone’s request to use the code elsewhere)
I mean, Hatetris probably wasn't using the Tetris trademarks properly, right? Aren't both just remix culture?
Legally though, just because one person's proprietary work relies upon another person's proprietary work, doesn't mean it suddenly becomes open source or public domain.