Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
1–10 of 794 posts
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#2Interesting, but they commissioned it. :) I'm curious if there are other assessments with different methodologies, different outcomes.
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#3Interesting, but they commissioned it. :) I'm curious if there are other assessments with different methodologies, different outcomes.
Agreed
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#4>90% less greenhouse emissions, 99% less water, and 93% less land
This was a great video concerning those claims above....
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#5Agricultural land or just Arable land?
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#6Interesting, but they commissioned it. :) I'm curious if there are other assessments with different methodologies, different outcomes.
Is it even interesting though? How can it be trusted at all?
This kind of study is really easy to massage into the result you want. You're dealing with extremely variable, large-scale supply chains.
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#7That's good and all but the taste is still far off from normal. Impossible is a lot better but still not an exact fit.
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#8A bag of rice is probably a lot better than a Beyond Burger.
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#9And 5x more sodium, which is a shame because I really do like the way they taste.
Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)
#10And if you’ve tried one, just about 99% less taste.