In all seriousness, why do you think there's a noticeable difference between Canadian men and women according to this data? I mean from the looks of it most, countries Mens numbers were higher.
Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#22Ascorbic acid derived from glucose
Crystalline fructose
Dextrin or Dextrose
Ethyl maltol
Fumaric or Lactic acid
Glucose
Hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP)
Malt, Maltodextrin, Maltose or Maltol
Mannitol
Polydextrose
Polysorbates
Potassium gluconate
Propylene glycol monostearate
Tocopherol
Xanthan gum
And of course all these ingredients are used in abundance because they are cheap, and of course all these corn derivatives are cheap because of corn subsidies, and of course there are subsidies because of the massive amount of corn lobbyists and such.
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#23These findings lead me to further believe something I have long suspected...Since 1980, the Women of Canada have not abided by the rules of halfsies. Stop eating my skittles, ladies. :( In all seriousness, why do you think there's a noticeable difference between Canadian men and women according to this data? I mean from the looks of it most, countries Mens numbers were higher.
http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/health53a-eng.htm
I would guess that Canadian men have had problems with diabetes for a long time (>30yrs) and women are now starting to catch up. But I think you'd need more numbers than are in that map to get any real answers.
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#24These findings lead me to further believe something I have long suspected...Since 1980, the Women of Canada have not abided by the rules of halfsies. Stop eating my skittles, ladies. :( In all seriousness, why do you think there's a noticeable difference between Canadian men and women according to this data? I mean from the looks of it most, countries Mens numbers were higher.
"Across the world the rate of diabetes rose by 18% for men and by 23% for women"
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#25These findings lead me to further believe something I have long suspected...Since 1980, the Women of Canada have not abided by the rules of halfsies. Stop eating my skittles, ladies. :( In all seriousness, why do you think there's a noticeable difference between Canadian men and women according to this data? I mean from the looks of it most, countries Mens numbers were higher.
And as a sidenote, if you look at e.g., Africa, you can see women's rates are going up faster in many countries, and in fact globally: "Across the world the rate of diabetes rose by 18% for men and by 23% for women"
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#26These findings lead me to further believe something I have long suspected...Since 1980, the Women of Canada have not abided by the rules of halfsies. Stop eating my skittles, ladies. :( In all seriousness, why do you think there's a noticeable difference between Canadian men and women according to this data? I mean from the looks of it most, countries Mens numbers were higher.
And as a sidenote, if you look at e.g., Africa, you can see women's rates are going up faster in many countries, and in fact globally: "Across the world the rate of diabetes rose by 18% for men and by 23% for women"
Re: Sugar Rush: The progress of a disease over thirty years
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
And as a sidenote, if you look at e.g., Africa, you can see women's rates are going up faster in many countries, and in fact globally: "Across the world the rate of diabetes rose by 18% for men and by 23% for women"
I mean from a straightforward point of view you can understand the rise on a worldly basis just because of the progression of women's rights around the globe--but when you look at Canada what's changed since the late 70's to the point where women are taking in increased sugars?