Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
consumeraffairs.com
Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
1–10 of 123 posts
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#2Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#3But, they're still a startup. There's no SLA. They responded quickly, fixed the bug as soon as they caught it, and have been thorough in investigating any unauthorized access of accounts.
Why sue them? It's just going to disrupt a very good service. It's not going to help them recover (I'm sure they've already learned heavily from the mistake.)
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#4This is a ridiculous response, and one which seems very ungrounded in the law. Dropbox made a mistake—a big one. They pushed bad code to production that allowed for unauthenticated account access. But, they're still a startup. There's no SLA. They responded quickly, fixed the bug as soon as they caught it, and have been thorough in investigating any unauthorized access of accounts. Why sue them? It's just going to di…
That sounds very troubling to me. When it comes to user data/privacy, how does being a startup vs a huge corporation make any difference?
Besides, a company with tens of millions of users and billion dollar valuation is not really a startup anyway, if at all that matters.
I love dropbox and use it every single day on so many devices, but I did feel violated by this fiasco.
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#5This is a ridiculous response, and one which seems very ungrounded in the law. Dropbox made a mistake—a big one. They pushed bad code to production that allowed for unauthenticated account access. But, they're still a startup. There's no SLA. They responded quickly, fixed the bug as soon as they caught it, and have been thorough in investigating any unauthorized access of accounts. Why sue them? It's just going to di…
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#6My guess is this is going to just force Dropbox into some kind of settlement because it will be cheaper than fighting it. And the lawyers promoting this get a nice cut, of course.
Does corporate insurance cover this sort of thing? How does a company protect itself from these kind of lawsuits?
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#7This is a ridiculous response, and one which seems very ungrounded in the law. Dropbox made a mistake—a big one. They pushed bad code to production that allowed for unauthenticated account access. But, they're still a startup. There's no SLA. They responded quickly, fixed the bug as soon as they caught it, and have been thorough in investigating any unauthorized access of accounts. Why sue them? It's just going to di…
What? Is this an excuse? They charge money for the service and they will pay for their mistakes.
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#8Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#9This is a ridiculous response, and one which seems very ungrounded in the law. Dropbox made a mistake—a big one. They pushed bad code to production that allowed for unauthenticated account access. But, they're still a startup. There's no SLA. They responded quickly, fixed the bug as soon as they caught it, and have been thorough in investigating any unauthorized access of accounts. Why sue them? It's just going to di…
...they're still a startup... What? Is this an excuse? They charge money for the service and they will pay for their mistakes.
A punitive lawsuit isn't going to improve anything in terms of making sure they don't do it again.
Re: Dropbox sued for June 19 Authentication Bug
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
...they're still a startup... What? Is this an excuse? They charge money for the service and they will pay for their mistakes.
Yes, they'll pay for this mistake through bad press and lost customers. A punitive lawsuit isn't going to improve anything in terms of making sure they don't do it again.
What's stopping us to say the exact thing in defense of any xyz alleged offender?