Live data from Hacker News

An NFT That Saves Lives

paulgraham.com

31–40 of 213 posts

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#31

I don't get it. A non-profit is inherently a centralized entity. What's the point of using a blockchain in this scenario?

Verifiable donations, fully transparent reporting/auditing, no restrictions on who can donate, NFTs tied to donations that can be used for virtue signaling online, etc.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Except for that it uses technology that harms the environment. Apparently it's on Ethereum. Ethereum is already using an hybrid PoW / PoS (proof of stake) chain and at some point the PoS chain should be the only one. It PoS works, the impact on the environment should be a rounding error.

Haven't people been saying this for at least 4 years?

Maybe, but as of now the ETH2 beacon chain is running with > $14B of ETH locked in it, not launching honestly seems unlikely at this point.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#34

I don't get it. A non-profit is inherently a centralized entity. What's the point of using a blockchain in this scenario?

Verifiable donations, fully transparent reporting/auditing, no restrictions on who can donate, NFTs tied to donations that can be used for virtue signaling online, etc.

A blockchain isn't necessary for any of these things, though.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#36

I don't get it. A non-profit is inherently a centralized entity. What's the point of using a blockchain in this scenario?

Destroying the environment I guess. And surfing on the sad hype that the NFT buzzword have.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Verifiable donations, fully transparent reporting/auditing, no restrictions on who can donate, NFTs tied to donations that can be used for virtue signaling online, etc.

A blockchain isn't necessary for any of these things, though.

It works very well for all of them though.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#39
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except for that it uses technology that harms the environment. I don't think this trend is "fun" compared to a normal donation drive when it has these negative side effects.

The environmental harm of a single ethereum transaction is very low. Lower than a fundraising dinner. Please take your nitpicking elsewhere. They're literally aiming at saving thousands of lives and the comments are all focused on how bad NFTs are. Give me a break, talk about missing the point.

>The environmental harm of a single ethereum transaction is very low.

"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible" ~ Stanisław Jerzy Lec

No transaction individually harms the environment. The collection of all transactions harms the environment. This one transaction is part of that collection and it has potential to help attract people to the platform which will encourage more transactions in the future.

Re: An NFT That Saves Lives

#40

Leveraging manias for social good sounds appropriately disruptive .. Is there a way to short NFTs? I wish I could proactively sell people's regret to them.

As Matt Levine would say, the way to do that is to mint and sell your own NFT. That way you are on the opposite side of the trade as the bulls who you believe are wrong.
Post reply on HN