I understand the appeal of Salesforce, though in my experience it is just as clunky and slow as the software it replaced. I'm sure there are configurations that are not that way, but it's a horrible part of my day to day experience using it as a customer support module. Comments take 4 seconds to add. Opening a case in a new tab is 30 seconds or more. Comments and feeds load progressively, slowly, making it nearly im…
You're not the intended user of Salesforce. The UIs and flows you use are mostly data entry funnels for the true user: management and executives. You didn't pay for the software; they did. "End-user" satisfaction is low on the product feature list. Every time your client slows down, somewhere an executive was promoted.
What's Salesforce? (2019)
131–140 of 206 posts
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#132Salesforce is amazing, in the sense that it truly lives up to its name. Everytime I've been hired into an executive role I've cancelled our Salesforce subscription and productivity has gone up. Its clunky, slow and overly complex if you ask me. But their success cannot be denied, thus they must have an amazing salesforce.
The world of CRM is so weird. I worked with Real Estate Agency (<20 employees) and they were looking into CRMs. After trying out half a dozen CRMs they ended up commissioning a custom one. There is no single CRM out there that is designed for you.
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
All companies in this space start out fast and user friendly, but to gain additional customers in this space they need to add more features. See my first item. Then they either fail or end up an uber-platform. Again, this has nothing to do with your company, it is just the nature of the market, and it's funny when someone gets an idea to start a "lean", "fast" product as if no one else had thought of that before. Rea…
I agree, it’s their business priorities which result in engineering that leads to bad software. What I’m saying is you can choose to not buy into one of those uber-programmable enterprise platforms and instead (let someone) build fast and user friendly specific software just for your needs. All of the customization and dynamic crap can go out of the window that way, which will allow engineers to make things fast and…
the problem is not everyone can afford a IT dept with software programmers that can build out custom software.
If IT is not their core most companies seek out software that is already out there with somewhat decent reputation.
edit: at one of my previous job, they have a in-house software that was build with older technology that needs to rebuild. they outsourced it to Capgemini. it started when i join the company and by the time that i was out (4 yrs). they still didn't get it covert. they kick out Capgemini around two years in and hand it to another consulting company and the new consulting company junk out Capgemini's code and start from scratch.
i'll like to know more details on how they botched this project, it always make me curious how they botch it up for 4 years and two million wasted.
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#134I understand the appeal of Salesforce, though in my experience it is just as clunky and slow as the software it replaced. I'm sure there are configurations that are not that way, but it's a horrible part of my day to day experience using it as a customer support module. Comments take 4 seconds to add. Opening a case in a new tab is 30 seconds or more. Comments and feeds load progressively, slowly, making it nearly im…
Is it heavy JS load on the client side, or slow processing on server side that causes this sluggishness?
Salesforce's response to the client-side half of the problem is migrating from Aura to Lightning Web Components. LWC is statically analyzable and Aura is not, so they can get some optimizations in that way. On the flip-side, LWC is a piss-poor framework because of how they've stunted it for optimization's sake.
Half of the beauty of Salesforce as a developer is the fact that I can build in a month what would typically take a standard web dev team a year to piece together. That's only true so long as my team works in Aura with all of the scaffolding tools and libraries we've built over the years.
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
from gp: > "...they currently like Pipe...something" probably pipedrive. it's pretty good for small sales (and some marketing) groups to manage their pipelines. easy to get up and running and fairly flexible for what it is. it's not going to replace salesforce though. hubspot is a mid-market marketing automation product, sitting between little pipedrive and huge salesforce. it's also pretty decent for what it is, hel…
I would love to have a chat with you - my company is in the middle of trying to decide on what route to go right now. We’re on Zoho right now and trying to make it work. Available for a chat?
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#136Salesforce is a full business app development platform with almost unmatched flexibility, fully hosted and programmable. CRM doesn’t really begin to cover it. This reads like I’m a zealot. I’m not. But there is nothing that I’ve seen that can do what it can do and, if you know how it works, you can leverage it for incredible time and efficiency savings for developing and deploying business apps.
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#137I've used Salesforce at every company I've worked at for the last 8 years. Here are my observations: - There is a special place in hell for the person who made the decision to have leads and contacts as separate objects. It creates all kinds of complexity. Some may have a need to work with leads but for clean reporting, you almost have to dump leads. Most B2B companies I know don't use the lead object and autoconvert…
The intended difference between contact and lead is that a contact is someone who you have some sort of a business relationship with -- either you are trying to sell them something, you are working with them, or have worked with them in the past. Leads are supposed to be wholly separate from that -- they might be a person, they might be a company, they might just be a rumor. They way leads is originally intended to b…
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#138I'm a pretty new Salesforce admin, and so far it has been a horrible experience. Apart from its horribly sluggish user experience, developing for it as also very frustrating. You can't restore backups! You can export your data, but there's no way to import it, because you can't set the object Id or autonumbered fields (like the case number, which gets communicated to the customer). They used to provide an extremely e…
Have you tried marking fields for user set IDs as external IDs. This field can then be used while doing upsert. But what do you mean by there is no way to import it? Apart from Dataloader there are a host of companies that offer this feature.
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#139I understand the appeal of Salesforce, though in my experience it is just as clunky and slow as the software it replaced. I'm sure there are configurations that are not that way, but it's a horrible part of my day to day experience using it as a customer support module. Comments take 4 seconds to add. Opening a case in a new tab is 30 seconds or more. Comments and feeds load progressively, slowly, making it nearly im…
Re: What's Salesforce? (2019)
#140* A single developer can be incredibly productive at automating a company's business processes. Fresh out of college at my first job I was the only developer supporting hundreds of daily users across our sales, customer support, operations, and finance departments - most of whom were basically working out of Salesforce full-time. Salesforce also proved really adaptable for supporting all of the crazy sales campaigns or operations initiatives that management could dream up - often with quick turnaround times. For me there is no question that the Saleforce licensing costs (or some other low-code alternative) are worthwhile for most businesses vs. trying to build internal systems from scratch.
* Developers are in high demand, and I have received lots of requests from former colleagues looking for a Salesforce developer - even a decade after I moved away from full-time Salesforce development. When I have accepted these offers I've literally been told I can charge however much I want (although I do tend to keep it reasonable).
* You tend to have much more direct contact with your users than in other B2B or B2C development roles. And users are often super-appreciative of even simple changes. It really is a great feeling to see the difference that your work makes firsthand, and I have had some great working relationships with sales and support managers over the years.
* The core Salesforce platform (forms and data modeling, workflow, API integration, etc.) is actually an incredible piece of product design and engineering in my opinion. I know it's getting long in the tooth these days, but the team that built all of that deserves credit for getting so much of it right. All the stuff that Salesforce has built or acquired since then, unfortunately, has been much less impressive.
* Salesforce is expensive for sure, but not as bad as the pricing on their website would suggest. Apparently nobody pays the list price for Salesforce licenses, and a 50% discount from the list prices is not uncommon in my experience.
Ultimately I am glad I decided to get out of Salesforce development if only because the developer experience with almost any other programming language is just so much nicer. But I learned a lot from the experience - and I think those early interactions with users and firsthand experience of how business are run have made me a more well-rounded developer. I was also able to use the skills that I learned while doing Salesforce development to transition into a role building web applications, and pursue a more traditional development career.
And now as I am eyeing retirement, I am contemplating getting back into Salesforce consulting on a part-time basis.