Live data from Hacker News

Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

theconversation.com

31–40 of 78 posts

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#31

As someone for whom this is a real life practical issue, not some idle philosophizing, even asking the question is repugnant to me. I have incurable cancer and at some point I will decide "enough is enough" and I'd like to be euthanized by a doctor. The doctor will then have to decide if my suffering is sufficiently unbearable and only if he comes to that conclusion is he allowed to do it. He'll have to justify his j…

But euthanasia should not be allowed on a whim. For terminal diseases or other suffering it is more than warranted, but for folks who are going through a depressive episode and want to end their life, they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later. For you, I hope you’re not going to go through too much suffering and will be able to enjoy some quality moments before you leave us.

> That they’d regret later

You can’t regret stuff when you’re dead

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#32

As someone for whom this is a real life practical issue, not some idle philosophizing, even asking the question is repugnant to me. I have incurable cancer and at some point I will decide "enough is enough" and I'd like to be euthanized by a doctor. The doctor will then have to decide if my suffering is sufficiently unbearable and only if he comes to that conclusion is he allowed to do it. He'll have to justify his j…

At least we in NL have access to Euthanasia. Frankly I would like to see Futurama style suicide boots. OK, the latter may seem extreme, but why do we have all the liberty in the world to create life, including a lot of suffering, but not to end our own? In America, Euthanasia doesn’t seem like an option, but access to guns solves that option in practice. Terrible, but the hard reality. In the end, It is about quality…

There are actually a number of countries (and US states) that now have euthanasia laws. We got there first, but that also means we didn't get to learn from anyone. There are certainly problems with the Dutch laws, but there is no political will to change it, because it works 'well enough'.

I've extensively studied the Dutch euthanasia law and practice and think I know the right things to say to convince the doctor, but it really shouldn't have to be that hard.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#33

As someone for whom this is a real life practical issue, not some idle philosophizing, even asking the question is repugnant to me. I have incurable cancer and at some point I will decide "enough is enough" and I'd like to be euthanized by a doctor. The doctor will then have to decide if my suffering is sufficiently unbearable and only if he comes to that conclusion is he allowed to do it. He'll have to justify his j…

But euthanasia should not be allowed on a whim. For terminal diseases or other suffering it is more than warranted, but for folks who are going through a depressive episode and want to end their life, they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later. For you, I hope you’re not going to go through too much suffering and will be able to enjoy some quality moments before you leave us.

> they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later

Sorry to be that guy, but: "how?"

Our inacceptance of suicide and related concepts is entirely based what it does to others

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#34

As someone for whom this is a real life practical issue, not some idle philosophizing, even asking the question is repugnant to me. I have incurable cancer and at some point I will decide "enough is enough" and I'd like to be euthanized by a doctor. The doctor will then have to decide if my suffering is sufficiently unbearable and only if he comes to that conclusion is he allowed to do it. He'll have to justify his j…

At least we in NL have access to Euthanasia. Frankly I would like to see Futurama style suicide boots. OK, the latter may seem extreme, but why do we have all the liberty in the world to create life, including a lot of suffering, but not to end our own? In America, Euthanasia doesn’t seem like an option, but access to guns solves that option in practice. Terrible, but the hard reality. In the end, It is about quality…

The irony being... isn't euthanasia the ultimate freedom? If it is our body, and we have full autonomy as long as we aren't causing direct harm, the "American Way" should be to allow the freedom of choice as to what happens to said body.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But euthanasia should not be allowed on a whim. For terminal diseases or other suffering it is more than warranted, but for folks who are going through a depressive episode and want to end their life, they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later. For you, I hope you’re not going to go through too much suffering and will be able to enjoy some quality moments before you leave us.

> That they’d regret later You can’t regret stuff when you’re dead

I don't know if you're being serious or not, but this is actually a profound point that a lot of people don't seem to grasp (maybe because they don't really believe in death being final).

If you take this point seriously then it follows that there is only one important thing to do before you choose to die: Make sure your friends and family understand your choice and can live with it.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#36
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But euthanasia should not be allowed on a whim. For terminal diseases or other suffering it is more than warranted, but for folks who are going through a depressive episode and want to end their life, they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later. For you, I hope you’re not going to go through too much suffering and will be able to enjoy some quality moments before you leave us.

> they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later Sorry to be that guy, but: "how?" Our inacceptance of suicide and related concepts is entirely based what it does to others

No it’s not solely based off that. It’s also based off our knowledge of people who feel suicidal who later go on to lead happy and productive lives.

Assisting every person who feels suicidal is likely to assist in the death of plenty of people who would later have happy lives.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#37
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least we in NL have access to Euthanasia. Frankly I would like to see Futurama style suicide boots. OK, the latter may seem extreme, but why do we have all the liberty in the world to create life, including a lot of suffering, but not to end our own? In America, Euthanasia doesn’t seem like an option, but access to guns solves that option in practice. Terrible, but the hard reality. In the end, It is about quality…

The irony being... isn't euthanasia the ultimate freedom? If it is our body, and we have full autonomy as long as we aren't causing direct harm, the "American Way" should be to allow the freedom of choice as to what happens to said body.

And you are free to commit suicide in the US. From what i understand most laws making suicide and attempted suicide are no longer enforced or were changed.

What’s we don’t do is make it easy for someone else to assist in your death. That opens up an entirely different can of worms and anyone who thinks that’s an easy change to make is delusional. It’s fraught with issues and one needs to tread carefully.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>How do you justify that especially if one can't contribute much to society anymore and maybe didn't raise kids on your own? Interesting point. I do think it is kind of insane that like 70% of our government money goes to old people. Investing in the past instead of the future? Meanwhile everything else is getting cut, because SS and medicare are "mandatory" spending. The reality is that these old folks did not pay h…

That’s a pretty gross and ignorant perspective. Try reading a little less Paul Ryan. Apropos to Medicare, I live a block away the president of a local hospital and healthcare network. I remember just before COVID, he drove by in his Porsche and waved, on his way to go on TV to complain about reimbursements from Medicare falling (because the quality of care in the the hospital sucks) and that state government was “kil…

America has deep issues to solve in this domain. This sounds like a sci-fi movie to people in other countries ... and the other countries are not perfect either.

It will take some kind of amazing leadership to solve which could be a long time coming if current climate is any indicator.

Very hard for friends and allies to watch.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#39
post #36
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> they may take a rash decision that they’d regret later Sorry to be that guy, but: "how?" Our inacceptance of suicide and related concepts is entirely based what it does to others

No it’s not solely based off that. It’s also based off our knowledge of people who feel suicidal who later go on to lead happy and productive lives. Assisting every person who feels suicidal is likely to assist in the death of plenty of people who would later have happy lives.

If the people that remain behind are at peace with the decision it doesn't really matter 'what might have been'.

Also, taking away the 'easy' option means that a large number of people will do it in a way that is more gruesome and much harder for the people left behind.

Re: Do we have a moral obligation to live for as long as possible?

#40
post #37
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The irony being... isn't euthanasia the ultimate freedom? If it is our body, and we have full autonomy as long as we aren't causing direct harm, the "American Way" should be to allow the freedom of choice as to what happens to said body.

And you are free to commit suicide in the US. From what i understand most laws making suicide and attempted suicide are no longer enforced or were changed. What’s we don’t do is make it easy for someone else to assist in your death . That opens up an entirely different can of worms and anyone who thinks that’s an easy change to make is delusional. It’s fraught with issues and one needs to tread carefully.

It's definitely complicated, but in two countries the courts have already ruled that the ban on assistance violates the European Convention on Human Rights.
Post reply on HN