Live data from Hacker News

“About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts today”

twitter.com

1–10 of 1001 posts

Re: “About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts today”

#4
post #3

Isn’t that only 20 people? Edit: as in, this is misleadingly phrased as if it’s a large collective action

Still a third, which has organizational consequences.

More importantly, this 20 people includes senior employees which cannot easily be replaced.

> The entire iOS team is out, Head of Design and one of the oldest hires is out of the team and the Rails Core Team as well.

https://twitter.com/agisilaosts/status/1388213430004375555

Re: “About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts today”

#7
post #2

"Changes at Basecamp" : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26944192 ( 4 days ago, 774 comments ). Which is a feel good piece about management philosophy ( a bit back to our roots ) and does not mention layoffs once.

Sounds more like a "if you don't like it you can leave" and a bunch of people taking them up on it than a planned layoff. Would love to know what number of leavers they expected (I assume they expected/hoped for some) vs they got.

Re: “About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts today”

#8
post #7
post #2

"Changes at Basecamp" : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26944192 ( 4 days ago, 774 comments ). Which is a feel good piece about management philosophy ( a bit back to our roots ) and does not mention layoffs once.

Sounds more like a "if you don't like it you can leave" and a bunch of people taking them up on it than a planned layoff. Would love to know what number of leavers they expected (I assume they expected/hoped for some) vs they got.

Now you mention it, is surely reads like that. Especially at the end : Who made these decisions? Well, David and I did.

And I searched the HN comments, and nobody seems to have uttered the words leaving or layoff.

Re: “About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts today”

#9
post #3

Isn’t that only 20 people? Edit: as in, this is misleadingly phrased as if it’s a large collective action

*Three* org heads, two lead developers, and seven developers (apparently the entire iOS team) in that group, at least. That's a recruitment/headcount nightmare... I wouldn't be surprised if other employees leave based on crunch and headcount alone.
Post reply on HN