Earlier quoted context omitted.
> People just desperately want to find evidence that the stuff we did this year made a huge difference. I don't think that's true at all. People have been receptive to the increased evidence that transmission on surfaces is pretty unlikely, for example, despite all the efforts we've put into sanitizing surfaces. I think most people can appreciate that all the shit we threw at the wall throughout the pandemic eventual…
To be clear: I'm not making a specific argument about masks vs. sanitizing vs. whatever here. I'm just saying: responses like the OP immediately leap to the conclusion that influenza went away because of all the stuff we did. It's an error in logic, driven by the emotional desire to believe that the stuff we did must have had a serious impact, and that anything else is not worth serious discussion. That's ideology, n…
I feel like you're coming down too hard on OP. He makes a valid argument.
> immediately leap to the conclusion that influenza went away because of all the stuff we did
It's not an error in logic. It's a reasonable conclusion to draw based on what we've seen and the links he provided. Whether it's true or not, that's debatable and probably nobody here on HN is going to figure that out definitively.
I'm really not sure why you're so argumentative without actually providing any substantial arguments against OP. It feels more like you're the one arguing from an ideological basis.