Fortran Package Manager
github.com
Fortran Package Manager
1–10 of 73 posts
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#2Fortran has one. But not C. What hath God wrought.
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#3Fortran has one. But not C. What hath God wrought.
C and c++ have a ton. Vcpkg, cpm, conan, hunter ...
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#4Fortran has a lot of interesting current compiler work leveraging MLIR, a subproject of LLVM: Flang [0] and CIL for C/C++/Fortran [1]. It seems like Fortran tooling is making somewhat of a comeback.
[0]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/flang
[1]: https://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/slides/CIL_Common_MLIR_Abstr...
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#5Fortran has one. But not C. What hath God wrought.
Well, in FORTRAN, GOD is REAL (and JESUS is INTEGER, but that's not as funny). Even modern fortran has to maintain this feature for legacy reasons, leading one to add 'implicit none' to the beginning of each module etc.
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#6This is... built using Fortran, NICE.
Writing a TOML parser in Fortran is precisely my definition of FUN.
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#7A single Fortan
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#8Fortran has a lot of interesting current compiler work leveraging MLIR, a subproject of LLVM: Flang [0] and CIL for C/C++/Fortran [1]. It seems like Fortran tooling is making somewhat of a comeback. [0]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/flang [1]: https://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/slides/CIL_Common_MLIR_Abstr...
"I don't know what the language of the year 2000 will look like, but I know it will be called Fortran." —Tony Hoare
Re: Fortran Package Manager
#9Fortran has one. But not C. What hath God wrought.
Well, in FORTRAN, GOD is REAL (and JESUS is INTEGER, but that's not as funny). Even modern fortran has to maintain this feature for legacy reasons, leading one to add 'implicit none' to the beginning of each module etc.
> in FORTRAN, GOD is REAL
.. but not COMPLEX nor LOGICAL