Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

xtal wrote: post #3

retrogradeorbit wrote: post #2

you're, not your. edit: desides? How old is the author, I wonder? It all sounds very 'schoolyard'.

> It all sounds very 'schoolyard'. Welcome to "hacking."

I think it's funny how someone who's been here for a month is welcoming someone who's been here for 1100+ days to "hacking". I agree though, it does sound quite schoolyard. The spelling and grammar mistakes don't help with the pathos of whoever 'A Team' is. I just posted this since I thought it was interesting how quickly Lulzsec has said bye bye after declaring war and more dumps every week with 'a big one' coming just this upcoming Monday. Saw this floating on /r/netsec so I thought to share it here.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#9

Post by rcfox » Sun, Jun 26, 2011, 5:28 AM UTC

callmeed wrote: post #5

What is a busy box?

I'm just guessing, but I think it's probably an installation of http://www.busybox.net/, which includes a standalone sshd. This would make it very easy to allow remote access once you're in a system.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#10

Post by [deleted] » Sun, Jun 26, 2011, 5:34 AM UTC

sliverstorm wrote: post #4

I am currently imagining the icy thrill running down their spines if these guys fingered them properly...

[deleted]