Live data from Hacker News

Farming robot kills 100k weeds per hour with lasers

freethink.com

481–483 of 483 posts

Re: Farming robot kills 100k weeds per hour with lasers

#481
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Drones do not seem like a logical step for me. I'm not a laser expert, but seems like the energy storage needed to kill hundreds to thousands of something with light is heavier than flying would realistically allow. Wheels and tracks are what farming is built around, no need to literally reinvent the wheel here.

Completely agree about flying: but I wonder about the wheel. A spider-carriage walking robot which could step around the valuable plants, climb steeper hills, and wouldn't dictate a row-and-plow approach to agriculture, that could be pretty compelling. Less soil compaction, more flexibility, could work inside forested regions as well. It has potential.

It's not just the robot though, it's the millions or tens of millions of dollars of wheeled or tracked equipment he already has.

Re: Farming robot kills 100k weeds per hour with lasers

#482
post #443
post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Drones also have poor flight time to recharging time ratio. Which means you need more of them to get the job done. Farms are designed to be serviced by farm vehicles. A vehicle makes a lot of sense.

Helium assisted drones could provide longer air time.

Hydrogen. Even lighter, much cheaper, and would save on a (very!) finite natural resource.

And, hey, with unmanned drones over rural fields you won't get any Hindenburg disasters.

Re: Farming robot kills 100k weeds per hour with lasers

#483
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Farmers already drive sprayers to kill weeds, so it's not like this would add labor costs. Maybe it's more expensive than chemicals, so they needed some other way to be cost-competitive.

That was mentioned in the article. Spraying weeds happens quite quickly. This vehicle maxes at 5mph so presumably hauling it around would take a lot longer.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN