Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
pogue.blogs.nytimes.com
Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#2Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#3Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#4Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#5Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#6Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#7"Having read through hundreds of comments from professionals, both civil and uncivil, I’m now convinced: Final Cut Pro X may indeed be ready for the future. But for professional video editors, it’s not yet ready for the present."
Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#8Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#9Re: Pogue bends over backwards to fight in support of Apple
#10This guy really doesn't understand what all the noise about FCPX is and what film and broadcast practices are. In that regard, I really do not understand why he wrote that article at all. It's as if I wrote an article on organic chemistry since I once read about it on wikipedia. I wrote about what FCPX vs FCP means to me here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=2695610
Your linked post seems much more down-to-earth and level-headed than the complaints I keep seeing everywhere. If all these professionals would hold off purchasing the new version (and I suppose they will with all the negative feedback from those who have already purchased), then Apple will feel the repercussions in lack of sales.