Live data from Hacker News

CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?

newstatesman.com

11–20 of 363 posts

Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?

#16
post #5

"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.

There isn't one. It's just not true. There is lots of creative work that is routinely outsourced and cannot be automated yet. A CEO of a startup constantly outsources tasks to people, whenever they cannot be automated easily.

Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?

#17
post #5

"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.

To outsource something you have to be able to unambiguously specify requirements (otherwise costs blow up as you go back and forth). Once you’ve made it truly unambiguous, the next logical step is automation.

>otherwise costs blow up as you go back and forth

I've seen that and it's apparently a viable business decision. I don't know why - I'm not an MBA

Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?

#19
post #5

"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.

To outsource something you have to be able to unambiguously specify requirements (otherwise costs blow up as you go back and forth). Once you’ve made it truly unambiguous, the next logical step is automation.

Not all automation is economically efficient - i.e. it's cheaper to hire outsourced janitors than building state of the art cleaning robots to automate their jobs.
Post reply on HN