CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
11–20 of 363 posts
Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#12Board still needs a throat to choke somewhere...
Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#13Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#14Board still needs a throat to choke somewhere...
Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#15Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#16"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.
Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#17"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.
To outsource something you have to be able to unambiguously specify requirements (otherwise costs blow up as you go back and forth). Once you’ve made it truly unambiguous, the next logical step is automation.
I've seen that and it's apparently a viable business decision. I don't know why - I'm not an MBA
Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#18Re: CEOs are hugely expensive – why not automate them?
#19"If a role can be outsourced, it can be automated." I really don't see the logic in this statement.
To outsource something you have to be able to unambiguously specify requirements (otherwise costs blow up as you go back and forth). Once you’ve made it truly unambiguous, the next logical step is automation.