Live data from Hacker News

Filecoin, StorJ and the problem with decentralized storage (2019)

randomoracle.wordpress.com

121–123 of 123 posts

Re: Filecoin, StorJ and the problem with decentralized storage (2019)

#121
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What do you base AWS storage having "an enormous markup" on? Probably on the basis that backblaze costs an order of magnitude less for the same product.

AFAIK s3 is multi datacenter whereas B2 is only one.

And you pay S3's markup for every datacenter you want your data to be stored in, plus AWS's network markup for the transfer between those datacenters, do you not?

Re: Filecoin, StorJ and the problem with decentralized storage (2019)

#122
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK s3 is multi datacenter whereas B2 is only one.

And you pay S3's markup for every datacenter you want your data to be stored in, plus AWS's network markup for the transfer between those datacenters, do you not?

S3 has lots of options. If you don't want multiple availability zones (which is having multiple copies in multiple datacenters) you can use S3 One Zone-IA.

https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/

Re: Filecoin, StorJ and the problem with decentralized storage (2019)

#123
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And you pay S3's markup for every datacenter you want your data to be stored in, plus AWS's network markup for the transfer between those datacenters, do you not?

S3 has lots of options. If you don't want multiple availability zones (which is having multiple copies in multiple datacenters) you can use S3 One Zone-IA. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/

I was replying to a comment which used AWS having multiple datacenters as a benefit over Backblaze which only has one. If your data is only in one datacenter either way, then does it really matter if a particular provider only has one datacenter?
Post reply on HN