Live data from Hacker News

Dan Kaminsky has died

twitter.com

71–80 of 216 posts

Re: Dan Kaminsky has died

#72
My memory of Dan is seeing him speak on-stage at SF security b-sides, some time in the mid 2010s.

He'd enjoyed a few drinks by the point he spoke to everyone, and the resulting honesty (accompanied by what I sensed as trepidation from the audience, about seeing a respected speaker in a vulnerable state) left a mark on me.

He was right: software security nowadays is a swiss-cheese mess, and the industry isn't addressing it.

His speech instructed me and perhaps others in the audience to deal with that new reality and adjust to it. It's tough for the original hacker / cypherpunk / purist mentality to adjust to. But it's where we are now, and it's a mindset that'll never die even if all of us that subscribe to it do.

RIP Dan.

Re: Dan Kaminsky has died

#73

I had dinner with Dan once, he ”social engineered” me and claimed he forgot to bring money. I knew what he was doing, but also knew that if picking up the tab was the price i had to pay for getting to hang out with him, I got the better end of the Deal. Rest In Peace

[deleted]

Re: Dan Kaminsky has died

#77
post #70

Does anyone have a copy of the sources for Paketto Keiretsu? It seems to have disappeared from his website(s) some years ago and I kept meaning to ask him for a copy. It was an early inspiration for a lot of my L3-in-userspace work.

It's where I learned about stateless scanning. Without scanrand and its stateless scanning technique Shodan wouldn't have been possible.

Re: Dan Kaminsky has died

#79
A sad day. A legend has passed - legendary for his skills, for his generosity, and for his personality. He was a true renaissance man - hacker, writer, presenter, philantropist, piano-player, composer, and good guy.

Re: Dan Kaminsky has died

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The tweet says “Please keep speculation to yourself”. Whether you think it’s appropriate or not, asking if anyone knows what happened is not the same as asking for speculation.

The former inevitably asks for speculation, especially given the short timeframe and lack of information involved.

I think it also unfortunately fuels the darker speculations rather than quells them.
Post reply on HN