Live data from Hacker News

The Girl in the Kent State Photo

washingtonpost.com

61–70 of 89 posts

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FWIW I think that this attitude is at the core of issues such as mass shootings and police violence. That I think it's largely cultural is also why I'm not convinced that gun restrictions will be super-effective at combating it. I think that all humans experience some measure of schadenfreude at seeing people they dislike get a comeuppance, but I don't think that enjoying physical retribution is innate. I remember on…

> Christianity brought "turn the other cheek", but 2000 years later look where we are. I've no interest in a debate on religion, but Christianity is the religion that brought "bad people burn in hell for eternity".

Christianity doesn't have the power to torture people for eternity, and it does have the power to influence believers towards forgiveness. "Bad people burn in hell" is a reassurance that the universe is just, which further enables forgiveness on earth.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#62
post #2

I cannot read this article without subscribing, and the title gives very little information. To save others a click: In 1970, an image of a dead protester immediately became iconic. But what happened to the 14-year-old kneeling next to him?

Can read the whole article, and it is well written and interesting; Using the HN 'materialistic' app.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or they view justice differently: > Justice: The world may be a difficult place to live, but it is basically just; people usually get what they deserve. The difficulties in one's life serve as a test to sort the deserving from the undeserving. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_Politics_(book)

Wow. Just wow. I don't live in a world where killing 4 students simply for standing around while a protest was going on to be just, even factoring in property damage, but you do you

> but you do you

It's possible to describe/explain something without condoning it.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#64

"Back in Kent, Ohio, local business owners ran an ad thanking the National Guard. Mail poured in to the mayor's office, blaming "dirty hippies," "longhairs" and "outside agitators" for the violence. Some Kent residents raised four fingers when they passed each other in the street, a silent signal that meant, "At least we got four of them." Nixon issued a statement saying that the students' actions had invited the tra…

Wow, I grew up in Kent and I never heard this side of the story. All of the circles I grew up in, despite being conservative, were on the side of the students and thought what the national guard did was an unspeakable tragedy.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#65

"Back in Kent, Ohio, local business owners ran an ad thanking the National Guard. Mail poured in to the mayor's office, blaming "dirty hippies," "longhairs" and "outside agitators" for the violence. Some Kent residents raised four fingers when they passed each other in the street, a silent signal that meant, "At least we got four of them." Nixon issued a statement saying that the students' actions had invited the tra…

There is no doubt that a similar reaction would occur today from the left if it was a Trump rally. Why? Trump supporters are nazis, etc, etc. They are dehumanized. It’s easy to be outraged when it’s a cause you support, but the true test is when it’s someone for a cause you don’t support.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#66
post #26
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think things like that are more a result of how information gets disseminated, and how it's framed, than bloodthirst. I'm sure if you took the people that hung that banner and made them hold hand with one of the students as they died, their enthusiasm would quickly fade. The word 'death' is just an abstraction that feels small when you're young, healthy, and haven't had to watch it happen. It's only easy to look at…

I applaud your optimism and boundless faith in humanity. But as a POC, I point out that America has a long tradition of taking children to witness lynchings, and the children would cheer. Or to beat foxes to death with sticks. I don't think it’s as simple as “people don’t have emppathy when death is abstract and indirect.” Lots of people don’t have empathy when they’re socially conditioned to believe a certain type o…

[flagged]

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#67
post #59
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cruelty is a human trait that is not bound by nationality, race, nor religion. I get the desire to slice up the pie of humanity and point to the piece called America; it gives us hope that maybe the problem can be solved. No human cruelty will never go away. It may wax and wane, but it will always be in our nature.

Cruelty may not be bound by time and space, but historically, cruelty has been “unevenly distributed.” If we were sitting side-by-side in the Warsaw Ghetto, I might agree with you intellectually, but nevertheless my immediate concern would be for the localized cruelty. I very much disagree that pointing out a particularly virulent strain of cruelty is motivated by the desire to hope that the problem can be solved per…

I can see how you read my post that way. I agree with you that it is not about the abstract group.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or they view justice differently: > Justice: The world may be a difficult place to live, but it is basically just; people usually get what they deserve. The difficulties in one's life serve as a test to sort the deserving from the undeserving. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_Politics_(book)

Anyone who views the Kent State killings as “justice” is deeply dangerous to the health and well-being of those around them.

There are state laws now being passed that make “blocking roads in protest” a felony, while legalizing running over protestors with your car.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#69
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cruelty is a human trait that is not bound by nationality, race, nor religion. I get the desire to slice up the pie of humanity and point to the piece called America; it gives us hope that maybe the problem can be solved. No human cruelty will never go away. It may wax and wane, but it will always be in our nature.

> No human cruelty will never go away. It may wax and wane, but it will always be in our nature. I'm optimistic that it will decrease over time, because frankly it has been, if you look at history. I mean, I remember reading up on the "bog bodies" and they figured out that pretty much the whole lot of them died quite brutal deaths.

Cruelty decreasing over time could ironically prove to be a bad thing if it results in us forgetting how violent we really are.

Re: The Girl in the Kent State Photo

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As long as we ignore the violent things done by our country for the past few hundred years, it will continue to poison our society. Reparations for slavery could be one approach, but it doesn’t account for enough of the pain we’ve caused. Genocide, slavery, civil war, imperial conquest, overthrowing democracies in favor of repressive regimes, to today’s bombing of people in other countries with drones. We don’t discu…

But we do discuss those things... constantly. It seems to be all we talk about. America's wrongs. To play the other half of this argument: America engaged in slavery, but also fought its bloodiest war to end it, played a major role in ending the Holocaust and freeing Europe from the Nazis, ended Japan's conquest of Asia, freed South Korea, and brought about through hyperpower probably the longest peace between major…

It’s some hubris to think that America brought peace to a wicked world. Especially when at the same time we gloss over the millions of people killed directly or indirectly by American policies and actions during our time in power. We'll never know if the third world and non-aligned movements would have produced a stable alternative, since they competed with American capitalism and thus were destroyed by America.

We did some noble things in the 1940s for sure. Since then, what would you say has been “staggering good”?

History is told by the victors, but that doesn’t make their actions just.

Post reply on HN