Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
1–10 of 278 posts
Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#2Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#3Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#4Not sure if this is the same one I read about, but it's the same concept: https://energyvault.com/
Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#5Gravity based battery, stuffed full of lithium ion batteries?
Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#6And these systems are way larger, more dangerous (wind) and not as efficient as magnetic bearing flywheels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage
This is basically the same as pumped water storage, but instead of immense amount of water you can pump between very large reservoirs, you’re limited to one solid weight that’s too light to store nontrivial amount of energy, but heavy enough to be significant problem from engineering perspective. It just doesn’t make practical sense.
Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#7Gravity based battery, stuffed full of lithium ion batteries?
Re: Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches, weights, mine shafts
#8And these systems are way larger, more dangerous (wind) and not as efficient as magnetic bearing flywheels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage