Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ngrok does something similar. This thing is a Pi. Secure it as you see fit. Sure worrying is a thing but this is to build what you want; private or public!
Irony, from the ngrok website: > DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION. Both the client and server are known to have serious reliability issues including memory and file descriptor leaks as well as crashes Guess what? Turns out doing this is harder than it looks. So like... I get the point your were trying to make, but it’s actually harder than it looks, and Vizy hasn’t convinced me their service is se…
Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
51–60 of 62 posts
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ngrok does something similar. This thing is a Pi. Secure it as you see fit. Sure worrying is a thing but this is to build what you want; private or public!
Irony, from the ngrok website: > DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION. Both the client and server are known to have serious reliability issues including memory and file descriptor leaks as well as crashes Guess what? Turns out doing this is harder than it looks. So like... I get the point your were trying to make, but it’s actually harder than it looks, and Vizy hasn’t convinced me their service is se…
I don't see that anywhere. Even if it is somewhere, it's not ironic. Ngrok is used for all sorts of stuff. Stream redirection to hosted services is a thing for ease of use to get going with play of a product.
The point is that making it easy makes it public sometimes, which is fine if the use cases aren't arbitrary made up to justify a worrisome argument. It it very unlikely an agent is going to penetrate and exploit one of these cameras through such a service. Squirrels don't need to be secured. Other things do, so reconfigure!
If you have a use case...a real one...then run this locally. The inventor and I are both privacy advocates. Your argument is cherry picked and overlooks the obvious on-premise use of a Raspberry Pi! :)
In all seriousness, I get what you are talking about, but being adamant dog poop use cases must be secured is pointless. Seriously, if you have a secure use case for this it does NOT have to be streamed to some service. The service is there for squirrels, not secure deployments.
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#53There are a few other, less expensive kits: AIY Vision Kit from Google, with Pi Zero ($50). Jetson Nano + IMX219 ($90).
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#54Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#55Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#56> If you’ve tried getting your device on the Internet, you’ll know that it’s typically not very easy. That is true. Doing that in a secure and responsible way is really hard. > Vizy’s software makes it really easy — it creates connections with public servers and provides you with a public URL that you can share with friends, family and colleagues. ...what if I don’t want my camera feed to be public? > Access to the s…
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Irony, from the ngrok website: > DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION. Both the client and server are known to have serious reliability issues including memory and file descriptor leaks as well as crashes Guess what? Turns out doing this is harder than it looks. So like... I get the point your were trying to make, but it’s actually harder than it looks, and Vizy hasn’t convinced me their service is se…
> DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION I don't see that anywhere. Even if it is somewhere, it's not ironic. Ngrok is used for all sorts of stuff. Stream redirection to hosted services is a thing for ease of use to get going with play of a product. The point is that making it easy makes it public sometimes, which is fine if the use cases aren't arbitrary made up to justify a worrisome argument. It it v…
> The inventor and I are both privacy advocates.
...
Well, you've certainly sold me on avoiding your product with that.
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Irony, from the ngrok website: > DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION. Both the client and server are known to have serious reliability issues including memory and file descriptor leaks as well as crashes Guess what? Turns out doing this is harder than it looks. So like... I get the point your were trying to make, but it’s actually harder than it looks, and Vizy hasn’t convinced me their service is se…
> DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION I don't see that anywhere. Even if it is somewhere, it's not ironic. Ngrok is used for all sorts of stuff. Stream redirection to hosted services is a thing for ease of use to get going with play of a product. The point is that making it easy makes it public sometimes, which is fine if the use cases aren't arbitrary made up to justify a worrisome argument. It it v…
> I don't see that anywhere.
I didn't find it on the website, but I did find it on the GitHub:
Re: Vizy, an AI Camera for the Pi
#59While I believe this is interesting project, I got really distracted by the PR around it. "scientist love flow chart" is like talking to babies and making fun of science at the same time. The fake scientist in all pictures ... probably I am not the target audience here.