Live data from Hacker News

LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

lulzsecurity.com

141–150 of 210 posts

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#141

Setting aside the release of this information, why was anyone able to get ahold of it? That's where the responsibility (and breach of public trust) starts.

Sharepoint is going to be the end of us all. It's always just jammed full of juicy stuff like this.

Not just SharePoint. Crawling a machine for special files is pretty simple. Here is a little script I used for a while. Could be modified to look for file headers(more specific) but who is going to change a .doc to a .pdf for security reasons?

     #!/usr/bin/python

     import os,shutil
     exts = [".txt",".doc",".docx",".xls",".xlsx",".ppt",".pptx"]
     

     startpath = os.environ['HOMEDRIVE']
     
     
     def find(none, directory, filenames):                      
         for file in filenames:                                      
             for ext in exts:                      
                 if file.endswith(ext):                
                     fullfile = os.path.join(directory,file)
                     try:
                         shutil.copy(fullfile,file)
                     except IOError:
                         pass # access denied
     os.path.walk(startpath,find, None)

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#142
post #58

There's certainly a bunch of interesting stuff in there, like how officers are instructed to place iPhone in nickel or copper plated containers in order to prevent remote wipes and a ton of information about gangs and smuggling. There's also other cool technical stuff in there, like how they gather digital evidence, information about hacker forums like ryan1918.com that have information on FBI honeypots and a book on…

> like how officers are instructed to place iPhone in nickel or copper plated containers in order to prevent remote wipes Idea: a self-destruct mode where if your phone can't call home to check for remote wipe and kick an internal watchdog, it will prompt for local self-destruct override. Failing that, automatic wipe.

Blackberry has this build in. It can also wipe your device if the battery gets too low.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#143
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bingo. Brinqs to mind Columbia University advising some of its students not to discuss the wikileaks cables since it could hurt their employment prospects. http://oudaily.com/news/2010/dec/06/our-view-dont-talk-about...

That advice is entirely to do with the fact that the information was classified and the federal government doesn't want to hire people whose treatment of classified information is to post links to it on Facebook . It is a reasonable suggestion to people seeking employment in government.

What about linking to the NYT articles, those weren't any less "classified".

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#144
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> like how officers are instructed to place iPhone in nickel or copper plated containers in order to prevent remote wipes Idea: a self-destruct mode where if your phone can't call home to check for remote wipe and kick an internal watchdog, it will prompt for local self-destruct override. Failing that, automatic wipe.

Better idea: add an RFID reader internally, and carry an RFID tag on your keychain. When it can't read the tag for X minutes, then wipe. If you leave your phone on the other side of the house a lot, just leave your keys with it.

Combined with a good backup policy (you can setup your iPhone to backup each sync), this would be workable.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#145

To those who actually downloaded the torrent: Did any of you happen to watch the 4-second-long video clip of what appears to be 4 men being gunned down by helicopter? Any theories on why it's there?

Old video from Iraq of a gunship returning fire. These are passed along A LOT from police office to office. Nothing news breaking.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#146
post #28
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how you can justify upholding laws with lethal force if you don't agree morally with the law. Just because you wear a badge on your chest doesn't mean that you aren't morally responsible for your actions as a human being. If some state passed a law which outlawed red hair, I would hope that the police would refuse to enforce it, rather than saying "take it up with your legislator." "I was just following o…

If you can't uphold the law as a cop you would lose your job. Laws don't just magically appear, right? By the time they pass as a law the cop is just doing their job. We didn't do our job as voters and the correct action now is to "take it up with your legislator".

It's actually kind of rare that cops lose their jobs for not upholding the law. Check out the front page of reddit.com/r/bad_cop_no_dounut, and you'll get a sampling of how cops regularly brutalize the law and the people they're meant to serve.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#147

To those who actually downloaded the torrent: Did any of you happen to watch the 4-second-long video clip of what appears to be 4 men being gunned down by helicopter? Any theories on why it's there?

Old video from Iraq of a gunship returning fire. These are passed along A LOT from police office to office. Nothing news breaking.

Just seems kind of tasteless, I guess.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You said family's names. I argue that their names, addresses and phone numbers shouldn't have been released. The fact that some of them have wives with name X is just another piece of personal info that shouldn't have been released, but it certainly isn't all of it.

No apostrophe on "family" sir (you change meaning by taking that liberty), though I should have placed a comma or a slash between family and names. Unless personally involved in any wrongdoing, I don't think it makes any meaningful difference to have the officer's names.

When I refer to collection of names assigned to a person that aren't given to them by their parents, I generally call that the last name. Apologies, 'family name' never struck me as a term for that word, so my mind automatically translated it. Yay being a United States-ian.

And having the officer's given names ~probably~ isn't meaningful, I suppose I can give you. Not dangerous, just creepy (perhaps part of the intended result?) ... though, also likely on public record. That said, I agree that even their "family name" shouldn't have been mentioned unless they were personally involved in wrongdoing. Technically, that's not LulzSec's job, but I wouldn't have counted a more noble vigilante quite as intensely in the wrong, here.

[edit: fixed some of my stupidity in response]

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Old video from Iraq of a gunship returning fire. These are passed along A LOT from police office to office. Nothing news breaking.

Just seems kind of tasteless, I guess.

I agree. Same could be said about passing on pictures of over weight people at Wal-Mart or ugly people with memes typed on them. Different strokes for different folks.

Re: LulzSec releases trove of AZ law enforcement documents

#150
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War Honestly, having the mexican drug violence spill over into the border states is probably the best thing that could ever happen to this country.

> Honestly, having the mexican drug violence spill over into the border states is probably the best thing that could ever happen to this country. I understand your point, but would tend to disagree until AZ gets a new governor. I vainly hope that the international drug war is ended in the next decade.

Only when some of the more restrictive governments (I'm looking mostly at you, US) lift the illegality of drugs.

The insane margins are not due to the fact that drugs are expensive to make, but that the product is illegal.

Prohibitions should taught us something. What we have now is Al Capone, but on a global scale.

Post reply on HN