Live data from Hacker News

Connectors That Changed the World

outfunnel.com

21–30 of 51 posts

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#21
Correction on #3: It was generally the brakemen, not the engineers, who were doing the coupling. (Engineers mostly stayed in the engine.) It’s horrifying how cavalierly this problem was treated; there’s an old joke about how, at conventions for brakemen, everyone had to pair up to applaud.

Brakemen also had the unenviable job of running along the tops of the cars while the train was in motion, jumping the gaps to get to the brake wheels on each car. In fact, I’d argue that more important than the automatic coupler was the automatic continuous brake—particularly the Westhinghouse air brake and its gladhand connector, still used today on railways and semi-trailers—which was considerably safer (both for the brakemen and also for everyone else, since trains would now fail safe and stop if they broke) and made longer and faster trains possible.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And neither are they RS-232, unless you've got a transceiver (MAX232 etc) in there :) Man... USB CDC is painful. It's so much "fun" that a serious solution on one product was two back-to-back FTDI transceivers. I think they finally designed that out, but I'm scared to look at what might be in its place now....

https://www.tindie.com/products/8086net/usb-usb-null-modem-c... presented without comment

That is equally parts silly and useful. There's so many time's I wish I'd had one.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#23
post #20
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

RS232 is the electrical signal standard; the chunky connector usually used is a DB25 but basic RS232 can fit in DB9 RJ11 (eg landline) and RJ45 (eg ethernet) were also connectors that achieved very widespread use, as did RG6 (eg cable tv) (I'm not going to say they changed the world and I'm also not so sure I like the grab-bag nature of the various things the article lists either for example, 8, 14 and 16 (and more)…

If you are interested in being a pedant, which you may or may not be: What you call DB-9 is actually D E -9. (A DB-9 would be the size of a DB-25 but with only 9 pins, which would be weird.) What you call RJ11 is a 6p2c. (Six position, two connectors.) What you call an RJ45 is an 8p8c. (You can guess this one.)

To expand on the pedanticness:

The letter in the D-subminiature line (aside: they really didn’t anticipate how small connectors were going to become) refers to the shell size (A through E, though not in size order). “DB” is frequently used colloquially as a prefix for any size in the line. There’s also some interesting variants like the DB13W3, which is a B-size shell containing 10 ordinary pins plus 3 coax connectors.

RJ11/RJ45 refer to the connectors and the way they’re wired, together. For example, RJ14 is the same 6p connector as RJ11 but wired to support two phone lines instead of just one, and the same 8p8c connector we’d use for Ethernet but wired for 4 phone lines would be an RJ61.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#24

Tim Hunkin, who was behind the British show The Secret Life of Machines , is releasing a YouTube series called The Secret Life of Components , and episode six is about Connectors: * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q43tZ6DjuIE His channel (which also has the original Machines series available): * https://www.youtube.com/c/timhunkin1/videos * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Hunkin

I was hoping someone would mention him. I found out about that series recently and have really been enjoying it.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#25
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet I wonder how many of those machines have USB to RS-232 converters internally... not that I've ever been asked to design such a thing.... Properly implemented RS-232 is a thing of beauty, in a way that USB just can't be. It's a shame so many implementations (of both!) fall short.

Is it two lines with ^S/^Q/BREAK, or hardware flow control, with or without ring, db25->db9 converters (never of the right gender), etc... I was pretty happy to throw it out the window in favor of USB. Of course, firewire was better than usb and the whole cycle started again.

I've recently started working with firewire, and man what an interesting bus. You've got isochronous and asynchronous support simultaneously, awesome! But then you get this: "Voltage is specified as unregulated and should nominally be about 25 volts (range 24 to 30)" Looking at the nearest firewire device on my table, it will certainly blow up if I get near it with 25 volts. It's like USB-C without any negotiation!

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#27

I really wish that regular trailers would develop some sort of standard linkage system rather than the SAE ball. I want to back up to my trailer and have it hitch a load equalizing connection without having raise/lower and get grease all over my hands and pants.

There is. Tractors for semitrailers have a fifth wheel, of course. That's the 90mm size. There's a smaller 50mm size used for RV trailers. The hitch for that bolts into the truck bed.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#28
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are interested in being a pedant, which you may or may not be: What you call DB-9 is actually D E -9. (A DB-9 would be the size of a DB-25 but with only 9 pins, which would be weird.) What you call RJ11 is a 6p2c. (Six position, two connectors.) What you call an RJ45 is an 8p8c. (You can guess this one.)

To expand on the pedanticness: The letter in the D-subminiature line (aside: they really didn’t anticipate how small connectors were going to become) refers to the shell size (A through E, though not in size order). “DB” is frequently used colloquially as a prefix for any size in the line. There’s also some interesting variants like the DB13W3, which is a B-size shell containing 10 ordinary pins plus 3 coax connector…

I fully expect another pedant to respond to this, any minute now.

Re: Connectors That Changed the World

#29
post #4

This article is a list of connectors that doesn't go into much detail into how each changed the world. The idea that APIs are a singular thing - or started as late as the article suggested - is also sufficiently wrong to put everything else written in the article into doubt.

It is an ad. It worked. Don't expect a car advertisement to teach you how an engine actually works.

Don't expect a car advertisement to teach you how an engine actually works.

Why not? [1]

[1] https://youtu.be/7Z_TaWWG_NI

Post reply on HN