Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 74 posts

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#11
Some tips I've been learning:

- Be ruthless about when you need to have a meeting. Its generally only if you need three or more decision-makers to come to a consensus on a strategy to solve some problem.

- Be ruthless about who you invite; it's usually only people who have something explicitly to contribute or who you know wish to be included.

- One person leading/driving the discussion, making sure to keep things on topic and within timeframes.

- A clearly defined agenda and goal, ideally written up in the invite message.

- Take very brief notes of decisions made and immediate actions, conclude with a rundown of these and follow up with them by email.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#12
These are probably the two best interesting aka "seemingly not in wide use" ideas we've tried, with great results:

- create a culture of actually RSVP'ing for meetings (yes or no!) so that people know who will be in a call and you don't waste 5 minutes wondering if X will be joining or if anyone will be joining at all. Pairs best with a culture of actually being on time for meetings and ending on time (so you can all be on time for the next one).

- to facilitate this, if you have a good agenda, people can opt out of coming if there are no relevant topics, or in some cases they can share their feedback on to a colleague or the organizer who will pass it on to the group on their behalf. As a result of this process, some of our "best" (from today's point of view; they used to be the worst in terms of getting through the agenda or understanding if this instance will be relevant to you) meetings have morphed into an actual commitment to have every participant spending 5-10 min to write down status updates in advance, with 2 minute actual "live meeting" check-ins: "anything besides the notes we all left for eachother, to discuss?"

This second one has been especially effective for our distributed management team in very different timezones where "overlap" meeting times (usually beginning-of-day-US/end-of-day-EU) are at a premium. You can do a few of those ("whole product team + stakeholders" "whole back-end dev team" "all engineering managers") meetings in one traditional-meeting time slot if you keep the agenda razor focused.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#13
There are many different types of meetings, so you will need to give some additional color on yours (number of people, frequency, is it within a team, cross team etc).

Effective meetings are hard. I struggle moderating them constantly. Here’s what I learnt:

- Be clear about the purpose of the meeting - is it knowledge sharing, is it to kick people’s butts to progress towards a goal, is it to build camaraderie, etc. Information sharing can be much looser in structure, a project meeting needs to be run with a more tight agenda. A social meeting should be relaxed and have avenues to break the ice

- Always keep meeting minutes (unless it’s a social focused meeting) and write down who will do what afterwards (and follow up on those points). Even if the first few times it’s unsuccessful, eventually it will improve overall discipline. However sometimes it’s an uphill battle that can’t be won - imperfection is okay, people are lazy and won’t do everything they agreed to do in a time manner. Just push them in the right direction

- Focus on the important things, make sure they are covered off in the meeting. Thus, meeting prep is vital - plan the interactions as much as possible in your head and write the goal you want to achieve from the meeting

- Don’t hold unnecessary meetings. Respect people’s time as much as possible

- Practice makes perfect. There are so many combinations of types of meetings that you just need to develop a feel for them

- Try and understand the personalities of who is attending. This will give you strategies to make the meeting more effective. For example a decision maker who never replies to emails and takes too long to make a decision - you want to pin them down in the meeting and gently pressure them to come to a conclusion, because once the meeting is over, they will spend another week procrastinating! Others like to work together and chat more, for them, meetings help give energy to move towards common goals. Others are less social and want to focus on doing work, those meetings should be much more concise and direct

Hope that helps

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#14

Run less or no meetings. If you have to run meetings, consider the option to temporarily institute an approval process by senior management whereby the thesis for any meeting (proposed agenda, attendees, etc.) is first proposed in private. Then senior management has the opportunity to ask questions and give feedback. This alone will force those convening to think twice. If necessary, quantify the cost of the meeting…

This is nuts. Having management approve meetings? How about "learn to communicate: decline unnecessary meetings and figure out how to reconcile disagreements".

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#15

I definitely feel the growth of meetings has been a bit insane since WFH started. Here's what I do: 1) separate technical meetings from process/operations meetings and clearly spell out the difference 2) Write in a narrative format what it is you're trying to accomplish and distribute this ahead of time. Doesn't have to be the often lauded "Amazon 6-pager", but if you can't explain what it is you're trying to accompl…

1) is a great advise that I think I can make use of, same for 2).

For 5) I feel it is hard. Often there are expectations that you join meetings just in case a higher-up manager needs a piece of information or I am afraid to loose out on critical information. Do you, in your organization, have an active meeting culture with feedback for meetings? It feels to me that in my organization too often when a conflict, next steps or any other decision is needed, instead of writing about it people just schedule meetings to discuss things. And then there are meetings where people just share information ("team meetings") that could be shared in writing much more efficiently (people read faster than others talk, so reading information is often more efficient from my point of view).

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#16
post #11

Some tips I've been learning: - Be ruthless about when you need to have a meeting. Its generally only if you need three or more decision-makers to come to a consensus on a strategy to solve some problem. - Be ruthless about who you invite; it's usually only people who have something explicitly to contribute or who you know wish to be included. - One person leading/driving the discussion, making sure to keep things on…

This comment has it all. A lot of other folks are missing the importance of a follow-up email. I always send a follow-up with notes/conclusions and action items assigned to people.

Too often I’ve attended meetings that might have well never happened because whatever got discussed was forgotten a month later and another meeting was held to discuss the same thing.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#17
Hi there, product person here. Due to the nature of the role I have to create meetings to agree on approaches, align on directions and communicate often. Very very, keen not to waste anyones time, so I try my best to email first and be present when facilitating meetings.

Two quick frameworks that you might find helpful:

1) The POST method, to give clarity at the beginning of a meeting: Purpose: What is the purpose of the meeting? Objective: What are you trying to achieve in the meeting, and what does success look like? Structure: What is the structure of the meeting we are having? Timing: How much time is allocated to the meeting?

https://gist.github.com/aaronbuchanan/2dcf936daceab925da61

I like this because it helps give quick context, also the mnemonic is quite handy.

2) Try to structure your meeting around other people's questions: - Going from basic what questions working up to why we need to make a decision, how they might be impacted etc. - I wrote a short post about it here: https://www.logikblok.com/supporting-asking-questions

I like this because it focuses your communication around your audience/user needs.

Aside from that and keeping everyone on the same track of discussion / time / documenting agreements all help out. Hope that helps.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#18
post #6

Product Manager here, I set a lot of meetings. Basically make sure there’s a very clear goal for the meeting and very clear bounds on what is being discussed. For me, I put an agenda in every meeting invite I send out with: 1. The purpose of the meeting 2. Bullet points on the things to consider 3. The end goal. What is the point we stop discussing Part of it is also keeping people talking about relevant things. It’s…

Your third point, setting an "end goal" is a great point! I have not thought about that often enough. I usually set agendas for my meetings but too often I do not define the ideal "final state" I would like to see from a meeting. Do you expect this also from others when they send you meetings? How do you handle regular meetings as a product manager, e.g. Sprint plannings in a Scrum context, do you then say: "My end goal for our planning is that everybody knows what to do in the next sprint"? Also, I tried to also ask this to others, but how is meeting feedback in your organization? My own meetings I have control over, but those are less than the ones other schedule where I am a participant, not an organizer.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#19
These are my guidelines. As they are mere guidelines mileage may vary depending on the participants and the context of the meeting.

If you call in a meeting:

- Have a clear picture of what you try to achieve with it.

- Communicate the purpose of the meeting in advance.

- Moderate the meeting to make sure that its participants actively contribute towards its goal. That is, if the meeting digresses, politely address it and make a constructive proposal on when and how to address the topic that caused the digression.

If you are being called into a meeting:

- Ask for what you can contribute to the goal of the meeting if it is not clear.

- Take responsibility in working towards the goal of the meeting.

This is hard work and I'm having enough Zoom fatigue so that I do not follow these guidelines myself at times but I try. I'm curious what others bring up.

Re: Ask HN: How do you run better meetings?

#20
Why are meetings better than records based (written, podcast, videos, whatever) asynchronous (remote friendly) discourse processes?

I've never been in a meeting that I consider productive. I've never been in a meeting that, in my opinion, couldn't have been done better with at least 90% of the time spent in the meeting completed by reviewing materials before the meeting and then signing off on them. Even that 10% could have been done with even an email / forum thread.

Post reply on HN