Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: You have a fortune of $100B, how would you fix earth in 3 years?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 34 posts

Re: Ask HN: You have a fortune of $100B, how would you fix earth in 3 years?

#11
Maybe not enough money to finish, but maybe enough to start...

Build a starlink-style satellite fleet in a ring around the earth, facing the sun head on.

Each satellite is basically a circular, large, thin-sheet mirror that pops open and unfolds from a coiled, folded, initially small packed size.

The outer edge is a conductor that can carry current and induce a magnetic field that is used to rotate it against the earth's magnetic field.

These can be used to focus sunlight on the pacific to generate cloud cover to tweak the earth's albedo at first.

Later when there are more, say about enough to filter 2% of incoming solar radiation, they can be used for fine-grained tweaking to control incident solar radiation using the controlled shadow they cast combined with the occasional reflective heating of spots to tweak wind flows and large body of water temperatures.

Coupled with climate modelling we use these to initiate a climate control programme which along with CO2 sequestration and some glacier geoengineering gives us our own climate as a garden.

PS: Maybe a lot of them focused on a small area could melt rock, in which case one could maybe carve channels for water to tweak water availability in large inland areas to allow modification of moisture/rainfall patterns.

Re: Ask HN: You have a fortune of $100B, how would you fix earth in 3 years?

#13
Focus on automating human labour as much as possible. Problems in the world all trace back to lack of resources. A rich man can afford to be 'nice to the environment', a poor man can't.

The below all are easier machine learning problems than self-driving cars, yet no big tech companies or national initiatives are focused on aggressively applying machine learning to them.

Likely a couple of billion dollars, a year, and a 100 people lab would 'solve' each specific problem.

1. Robot that cooks meals, and clean the dishes afterwards. That saves billions of hours daily.

2. Robotic self-cleaning toilets. Saves another billion hours daily.

3. Robots that can dig up dirt and build a house from that dirt.

4. An app that can teach anyone anything like a teacher would - literally - a talking avatar and cameras and voice output and machine learning powered dialogue.

5. Home manufacturing 'box' that can make 95% of anything that anyone typically wants (some arrangment of 3d printer/laser cutters/pcb placement/wood router machines etc, that can take plastics/wood/metal/electronic components and output a gadget/furniture etc)

The above 5 give the equivalent of a 'basic income' for everyone (if distributed to everyone, and assuming the finished gadget is about the size and complexity of an automobile).

Then the inputs/ouputs problem of energy/raw materials/waste needs to be provided. Disregarding scientific advances like fusion power etc (which require more than 100 billion maybe, or not possible), a drone distrubution platform for getting the energy / matter (input/waste) handled. To do this (as above, 100 people, a year, 1 billion dollars)

6. p2p aerial surveillance system for air traffic managment of millins of drones. Basically, a sky pointing camera gadget that analyzes and broadcasts what it sees and process. Millions/billions of these camera gadgets airdropped every few 100 meters .

7. a drone that can carry 100 kilos and drop ship materails/waste p2p using the p2p air traffic control. The drones are battery operated with range a coupel of kilometers.

8. a drone that can mid-air 'refuel' the above drones. Basically a flying battery that recharges that larger cargo drones.

Summary - 'gadgetize' every problem (it becomes a self contained mechano-electrical desktop/fridge size thing that a team of 100 people can rapidly iterate on) and throw machine learning at it at heavily as possible. Seek to eliminate human labour as fast as possible.

Re: Ask HN: You have a fortune of $100B, how would you fix earth in 3 years?

#14
I would end homelessness in the Western world. Sure, there are bigger problems especially in the less developed parts of the planet but other people have been trying to fix those for decades.

I am accepting that there are some things that x amount of money will not fix and simply targeting a problem where x amount of money and the right leadership can develop a model for ending homelessness that can be easily replicated elsewhere.

The answer would not be simple but employing lots of useless people, in the name of charity (as is the current 'solution') is one model I wouldn't be implementing.

Re: Ask HN: You have a fortune of $100B, how would you fix earth in 3 years?

#19
I would start an international propaganda program to put shame on anyone that has to do anything with the military. Movies, publishing, tv, music, books, buy politicians, anything so that joining or even supporting the military in any way is looked down upon. In any country.
Post reply on HN