Live data from Hacker News

Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

theguardian.com

1–10 of 86 posts

Re: Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

#2
I posted the original Guardian story yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26825990 but perhaps because of my lousy copyediting of the title it only attracted five upvotes. This follow-up story seems pretty good and the title was not difficult to squeeze under 80 chars.

The story of Facebook treating India's ruling BJP has attracted a fair bit of coverage - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu... - but the story suggests FB values good connections with the quasi-fascist ruling party over the risk of yet more damage to its reputation.

Re: Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

#3
post #2

I posted the original Guardian story yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26825990 but perhaps because of my lousy copyediting of the title it only attracted five upvotes. This follow-up story seems pretty good and the title was not difficult to squeeze under 80 chars. The story of Facebook treating India's ruling BJP has attracted a fair bit of coverage - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix…

I feel like Facebook has realized that if they win in a major market and becomes a monopoly, reputation no longer matters as they are dominant anyway. This is perhaps the logic behind nonintervention.

Re: Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

#6
With this finally being mentioned, it also needs to be said that they are quite enthusiastic about mowing down Congress on FB, and IG.

And that very much unlike other far more on the fringe parties. This was going on for far longer before Facebook's political engagement became known in the West.

It feels to me, Zuckerberg wants INC dead, and buried.

Wouldn't be against that myself. INC, is for all reasons, synonymic with corruption. But this will leave BJP with no counter whatsoever besides regional parties.

Re: Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

#8
post #2

I posted the original Guardian story yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26825990 but perhaps because of my lousy copyediting of the title it only attracted five upvotes. This follow-up story seems pretty good and the title was not difficult to squeeze under 80 chars. The story of Facebook treating India's ruling BJP has attracted a fair bit of coverage - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix…

> but the story suggests FB values good connections with the quasi-fascist ruling party over the risk of yet more damage to its reputation.

Do people need a better example?

He literally orders Facebook employees to read communist propaganda. https://amp.smh.com.au/technology/mark-zuckerberg-snapped-wi...

Re: Facebook removed fake accounts in India until it saw BJP politician was involved

#9
It seems to me on this topic almost everyone (including myself) is in a completely hypocritical position.

We want facebook to take action in countries where we disagree, but not take action in areas/countries where we agree. Here is a perfect example.

I imagine most people criticising Facebook here were in favour of facebook wiping the hunter biden story from everywhere. Because one is a conservative government, the other is a risk to electing a left wing one.

The other situation china. Most people find it outrageous that Google tried to get into china by building a censoring search engine. Yet expect Google and Facebook to filter disinformation elsewhere that is a threat to their side, or even just articles sceptical of lockdown.

Unfortunately in both cases we can't have both. These are directly conflicting situations, you can have one, but you can't have both.

Post reply on HN