Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
bloomberg.com
Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#2Lucid Motors at one point was valued at 70b without a single car on the road. And although Churchhill Capital 4 raised 1b, $24 billion was filled by PIPE investors iirc.
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#3Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#4I am still super long PSTH. It's the biggest SPAC ever led by a reputable value investor. The target will be huge (Stripe, Starlink, etc.)
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#5I am still super long PSTH. It's the biggest SPAC ever led by a reputable value investor. The target will be huge (Stripe, Starlink, etc.)
Ackman is an activist investor not a value investor. Ackman already said Stripe declined his approach.
The idea that such an approach is anything but value and anything but completely normal and somehow rebellious and untrustworthy is quite weird and speaks to some kind of capture of highly paid management position by some kind of group of people. (I really hesitate to use the word "class" because these people might be a temporary alliance including the born poor and status challenged - the marxist "born to it" doesn't help the analysis much at all. Think the cool, sports jock table at high school).
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#6I am still super long PSTH. It's the biggest SPAC ever led by a reputable value investor. The target will be huge (Stripe, Starlink, etc.)
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#7I am still super long PSTH. It's the biggest SPAC ever led by a reputable value investor. The target will be huge (Stripe, Starlink, etc.)
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#8TLDR: You need PIPE investors. Though with the recent correction, its harder to get, so it seems SPACs are trying to find companies they can merge w/o the need for PIPE to fill the rest. Lucid Motors at one point was valued at 70b without a single car on the road. And although Churchhill Capital 4 raised 1b, $24 billion was filled by PIPE investors iirc.
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#9I am still super long PSTH. It's the biggest SPAC ever led by a reputable value investor. The target will be huge (Stripe, Starlink, etc.)
Re: Big SPAC deals don’t need big SPACs
#10TLDR: You need PIPE investors. Though with the recent correction, its harder to get, so it seems SPACs are trying to find companies they can merge w/o the need for PIPE to fill the rest. Lucid Motors at one point was valued at 70b without a single car on the road. And although Churchhill Capital 4 raised 1b, $24 billion was filled by PIPE investors iirc.
What are PIPE investors? Do they get favourable terms?