Live data from Hacker News

The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

stackoverflow.blog

81–90 of 475 posts

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#81
post #43
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

The value of downvoting, or how Stackexchange gets it wrong about HN's voting system. It's hilarious that they start with some misconceptions about downvoting, notice that they're wrong, and forge boldly ahead without updating their understanding. If my hottest takes are any indication, the reputation floor -4 for a comment, not zero as they suggest. I haven't noticed a ceiling on upvotes. Upvotes help stories rise t…

> Flagging is for problematic stories.

If you follow at all which stories are rejected flagging is used as downvoting on a daily basis unless your definition of 'problematic' is extremely broad.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#82
post #43
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

The value of downvoting, or how Stackexchange gets it wrong about HN's voting system. It's hilarious that they start with some misconceptions about downvoting, notice that they're wrong, and forge boldly ahead without updating their understanding. If my hottest takes are any indication, the reputation floor -4 for a comment, not zero as they suggest. I haven't noticed a ceiling on upvotes. Upvotes help stories rise t…

The moderation is tailored to facilitate very specific types of discussion, and for specifically allowable opinions to be expressed.

My posting history started with me operating in very good faith, getting [dead] for politely expressing opinions that weren’t acceptable, and now I just occasionally post pre-dead posts here, knowing that few will even see them.

It’s my small way of reminding users who actually look at everything that this place is an extremely authoritarian place that is meant to only showcase certain things; and it is purposefully unwelcoming to others.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#83
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

HN definitely moves in the proper direction on this one. The ONLY purpose of down votes is to suppress conversation. If, contrarily, a user wished to provide a form of disagreement they would do so with a reply. Why? Because votes are a means of action to express an appeal to agreement/disagreement.

I remember pointing this out once on Reddit, before I deleted my account there, and it temporarily changed peoples' behavior resulting in more replies to disagreeable comments in either r/javascript or r/programming (I don't remember which). Most of the justifications that arose from down voting without a reply, supposedly a silent and anonymous form of disagreement, all summarized down to excuses about how writing anything takes too much time or a user's an inability to write an original comment. But then, in those users defense, Reddit feels like such an echo chamber.

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-...

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#84
post #65

I think a critical missing context of reposting an old 2009 article is that a newer post in 2011 makes downvotes free instead of costing reputation: >Jeff Atwood announced change of policy -- "Downvotes on questions no longer cost the casting user 1 reputation, so they are effectively “free”. [...] So, it’s imperative the question list have a high signal-to-noise ratio, and removing the penalty for those users who do…

Downvotes on questions are free, downvotes on answers cost 1 reputation (see https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7237/how-does-reput...).

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#85

I don't have the ability to downvote. Is it possible to undo an upvote? I sometimes upvote a comment by accident when viewing HN on mobile.

Downvoting is enabled when your karma reaches a threshold (500?). You can undo votes in either direction via the “unvote” or “undown” links that appear after voting. I think this is only possible for a short period of time after your original vote.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#86
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "If I downvote a misinformed post the original poster won't know where they went wrong, and people who see a grayed post won't necessarily understand what's wrong with it either." that's ok, the onus is on the downvoted poster to figure it out for themselves. usually that requires seeing a pattern over the course of a few downvoted posts rather than pinpointing it exactly from a given post. most downvoted posts bre…

I find it sort-of ironic that at the time I am writing this reply, _your_ comment has been downvoted and I'm not sure why. Presumably the onus is on you to figure that out, but good luck, since I'm not sure either and usually I can tell.

yes, sometimes the reason is truly inscrutible. that’s where the resilience part comes in. =)

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“one its major flaws is that people speak authoritatively about things they don't know about” See: any thread about aeronautics, education, or (historical) warfare.

... and machine learning and medical research and ...

I personally notice this most frequently on the topic of human nutrition. Most days I don't bother to read the comments on ANY nutrition article because they're too depressingly wrong.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#88

I don't have the ability to downvote. Is it possible to undo an upvote? I sometimes upvote a comment by accident when viewing HN on mobile.

Accidental upvotes used to be a problem, but that's been fixed for a while now. You should see the word "unvote" appear https://i.imgur.com/jaNanv9.png

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#89

I don't have the ability to downvote. Is it possible to undo an upvote? I sometimes upvote a comment by accident when viewing HN on mobile.

Yes - after you upvote, a link that says "unvote" will appear above the comment. E.g. the following text currently appears to me above your comment:

Scottopherson 5 minutes ago | unvote | parent | flag | favorite | on: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets ...

Don't feel bad that you didn't notice - I was reading HN for a long time before I realised that un-upvoting was possible.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#90
post #74

I don't know if these are popular opinions or not: 1: I really wish I could downvote Hacker News articles. 2: I really wish there was some friction to downvoting. Perhaps something like choosing among: disagree, factually wrong, mean, incoherent Regarding the downvoting of articles: For awhile I used to see a regular pattern of weird articles on the front page. The discussion would then predictably involve a mod defe…

Didn't slashdot have a feature kind of like this? Reasons why something was upvoted or downvoted alongside their score.
Post reply on HN