Live data from Hacker News

The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

stackoverflow.blog

71–80 of 475 posts

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#71
post #43
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

The value of downvoting, or how Stackexchange gets it wrong about HN's voting system. It's hilarious that they start with some misconceptions about downvoting, notice that they're wrong, and forge boldly ahead without updating their understanding. If my hottest takes are any indication, the reputation floor -4 for a comment, not zero as they suggest. I haven't noticed a ceiling on upvotes. Upvotes help stories rise t…

As far as reputation goes, I see little difference between HN and Reddit. Why do you think HN does it right and Reddit wrong?

SE prominently displays reputation points, which is different.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#72
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

Those are mostly out of date. Maybe stop self-celebrating past victories, it's not very becoming. ;)

Flagging is where HN gets it wrong, IMO. So many slightly controversial and important topics are being removed with this mechanism. We're left with all the vanilla stuff.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#73

I've been through several forum deaths. The cause is usually large growth from people with very different mindsets that downvote for essentially political reasons instead of encouraging good discourse. This makes the best people leave in short order. In a sense there's no way to structure a forum to avoid this. Being outnumbered by people who don't value open communication is unpleasant with or without downvoting. Fo…

Would actually like to see a list of largest karma-wise HN members who left.

By leaving I would say over 180 days inactive. Dang can you post the result please:

SELECT hn_name, hn_karma, hn_last_active FROM comments WHERE TIMESTAMPDIFF(DAY, hn_last_active, NOW()) > 180 ORDER BY hn_karma DESC LIMIT 100

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#74
I don't know if these are popular opinions or not:

1: I really wish I could downvote Hacker News articles.

2: I really wish there was some friction to downvoting. Perhaps something like choosing among: disagree, factually wrong, mean, incoherent

Regarding the downvoting of articles: For awhile I used to see a regular pattern of weird articles on the front page. The discussion would then predictably involve a mod defending the article. IMO, I think downvoting an article would help in this situation.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#76
post #72
post #23

Getting it wrong for 12 years now: The Value of Downvoting, Or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25633668 - Jan 2021 (1 comment) 10 Years In, Was He Right? “Value of Downvoting; How HN Gets It Wrong” - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23409231 - June 2020 (1 comment) The Value of Downvoting, or, How Hacker News Gets It Wrong (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=…

Those are mostly out of date. Maybe stop self-celebrating past victories, it's not very becoming. ;) Flagging is where HN gets it wrong, IMO. So many slightly controversial and important topics are being removed with this mechanism. We're left with all the vanilla stuff.

Flagging is necessary to keep the site on-topic in my opinion. People will happily upvote controversy that has little value or importance to this site.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What’s the criteria for a “bad comment”? And how do you objectively evaluate it? I lurk and post once in a while. What I’ve noticed is that rarely is something downvoted for being factually incorrect (relatively speaking). You just have to offer a perspective that doesn’t conform with the hive mind and the downvoting essentially amounts to censorship of opinions.

I'd appreciate some examples. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but in my experience downvoted comments tend to have something beyond a counterpoint or difference of opinion; their content is usually irrelevant or unnecessarily snarky or somehow hostile.

I don't really have the time to go digging around for examples, but it's common enough that one of the site rules is to not complain about downvotes because it frequently happens for no reason.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“one its major flaws is that people speak authoritatively about things they don't know about” See: any thread about aeronautics, education, or (historical) warfare.

... and machine learning and medical research and ...

... and ... and ... and ...

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#79
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are mostly out of date. Maybe stop self-celebrating past victories, it's not very becoming. ;) Flagging is where HN gets it wrong, IMO. So many slightly controversial and important topics are being removed with this mechanism. We're left with all the vanilla stuff.

Flagging is necessary to keep the site on-topic in my opinion. People will happily upvote controversy that has little value or importance to this site.

It makes for a nice beige set of topics for sure.

Re: The value of downvoting, or, how Hacker News gets it wrong (2009)

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's easier to write a bad comment than a good one, so I don't think that downvoting bad comments should be more difficult than it is now. HN software already has little nudges that make it easier to gain karma than to lose it: - You can earn points but never lose them by submitting URLs for discussion. - You can't lose more than 4 points per post, no matter how many times it is downvoted. There is no upper limit to…

> "If I downvote a misinformed post the original poster won't know where they went wrong, and people who see a grayed post won't necessarily understand what's wrong with it either." that's ok, the onus is on the downvoted poster to figure it out for themselves. usually that requires seeing a pattern over the course of a few downvoted posts rather than pinpointing it exactly from a given post. most downvoted posts bre…

I find it sort-of ironic that at the time I am writing this reply, _your_ comment has been downvoted and I'm not sure why.

Presumably the onus is on you to figure that out, but good luck, since I'm not sure either and usually I can tell.

Post reply on HN