Live data from Hacker News

$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

twitter.com

11–20 of 281 posts

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#11
post #6

They can gift some Teslas

Or make a donation 1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 I actually wonder what would happen to me, if I suddenly received some of that stolen bitcoin.

Memorize your private keys. Destroy any physical or digital copies of the keys in a “boating accident”. Tell the authorities you can’t recover the funds. Wait 25 years or so. Move to somewhere outside jurisdiction or extradition from the relevant authorities. Cash out.

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#13
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or make a donation 1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 I actually wonder what would happen to me, if I suddenly received some of that stolen bitcoin.

>1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 A 1xxx addie? In 2021? Come on dude.

What’s wrong with 1-prefixed addresses?

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#14

Is that money trapped in the system? The moment they sell to USD that account is now linked to a real person no?

It's more difficult, but not impossible I think:

On the Bitcoin side you can "wash" it by mixing it with other coins, or deposit/withdraw it through multiple exchanges.

Then on the output side, you can get rid of it through shell companies or through less reputable sites, or into countries that won't extradite criminals.

So - it's definitely harder than normal, but I think you could find a way.

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#15
post #8

Here’s an interesting question — if you receive BTC from one of these addresses as payment for something, do you refuse it? You know it’s stolen and you might worry someone else who you might pay in the future would be able to track down that it’s stolen, so do you ask for “clean” BTC that isn’t linked to known theft? I don’t necessarily know the answer here. This is something that you can’t do with paper bills

> if you receive BTC from one of these addresses as payment for something, do you refuse it?

You cannot refuse a BTC transaction. You could return it in a subsequent transaction, and pay the transaction fee, but I would imagine your address would be forever tainted by a number of illicit address/transaction tracking algorithms.

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#16
post #8

Here’s an interesting question — if you receive BTC from one of these addresses as payment for something, do you refuse it? You know it’s stolen and you might worry someone else who you might pay in the future would be able to track down that it’s stolen, so do you ask for “clean” BTC that isn’t linked to known theft? I don’t necessarily know the answer here. This is something that you can’t do with paper bills

Can one even refuse it? If someone just sends tainted coin to my address, am I screwed?

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#18

Is that money trapped in the system? The moment they sell to USD that account is now linked to a real person no?

It's possible to swap into monero without using any KYC exchange, but that requires liquidity. So it could take years.

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#19
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or make a donation 1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 I actually wonder what would happen to me, if I suddenly received some of that stolen bitcoin.

>1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 A 1xxx addie? In 2021? Come on dude.

[deleted]

Re: $7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

#20
post #13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>1GVR2qbKgT4uVUQMYVgPhQxFcKRJBVYMo4 A 1xxx addie? In 2021? Come on dude.

What’s wrong with 1-prefixed addresses?

From https://bitcoinbriefly.com/practical-guide-bitcoin-addresses... :

"Legacy addresses start with the digit “1”. These Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash (P2PKH) addresses were once the standard address type up until August 2017. Many now advise against using them. Why?

Legacy addresses incur the most expensive transaction fees when sending payments. They also limit the Bitcoin network's ability to scale. And their case-sensitive nature often causes unwanted errors."

Post reply on HN