IAM Policies: Good, Bad and Ugly
stackery.io
IAM Policies: Good, Bad and Ugly
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: IAM Policies: Good, Bad and Ugly
#2Re: IAM Policies: Good, Bad and Ugly
#3:wave: I'm the author of the post! Anyone have any IAM horror stories of their own? Or examples of amazing IAM policies that really show their power?
Re: IAM Policies: Good, Bad and Ugly
#4:wave: I'm the author of the post! Anyone have any IAM horror stories of their own? Or examples of amazing IAM policies that really show their power?
I continue to be surprised by the so-called "S3 Bucket Negligence Award" which feels like the intersection of IAM and S3 configuration ugliness that result in so many public horror stories like: - https://www.upguard.com/breaches/attunity-data-leak - https://www.lastweekinaws.com/newsletter/reinforce-meant-lea...
One way is to scaffold in bucket policies that ensure data is always: encrypted at rest, encrypted in transit, and locked down so objects can't be public. People can override these if needed, but because these settings are the default most people don't know about them or know how to set them up.
At Stackery we always scaffold in S3 Buckets with these settings in place, while giving you the ability to check boxes to turn on website hosting or allow contents to be publicly available. That helps ensure people configure things right the first time and every time!