Earlier quoted context omitted.
$9 vs $20?
linode is expensive, you can find some cheap vps for less than 10$
Why I've built an alternative to Github
151–160 of 198 posts
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technically, yes.. waving your command line wand IS a solution. But also, technically, there isn't any reason why you shouldn't be able to keep 100+ small remote git repositories active for less than $100/month. Also, Github doesn't require you to know how to use tar, S3, or have any other Linux experience. So why should this particular use case? Why wouldn't a business be able to cater to that market? This is a busi…
> Github doesn't require you to know how to use tar ... or have any other Linux experience You don't need tar to package a git versioned project. All you need is some kind of zip program, and every major OS has one built in. The difference knowledge it requires to just zip up a directory and send it in an email, versus running a github connection is so minimal its laughable that anyone suggests that you need some kin…
Saving it to S3 is an option, but then you have to create that account too. Why shouldn't you be able to just use one account?
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#153Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see the parallel. Quite the opposite; he's displeased with what he sees as GitHub's high price for their lowest-tier paid account, and developed an alternative that costs less and offers more of the "bare bones" stuff (more space, unlimited private repos) instead of focusing on the higher-level collaboration tools and web interfaces. How does a reference to someone finding little friction to paying multiple t…
"[...] he's displeased with what he sees as GitHub's high price for their lowest-tier paid account [...] " And I'm arguing that his displeasure with GitHub's price comes from the fact that he's underestimating the extra amount of time he will have to spend as a user of CodePlane because CodePlane is not remotely as polished as GitHub. I'm arguing that this extra amount of time will not be worth the difference in pric…
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#155I think that anyone who complains about GitHub's price has gotten way too spoiled, or perhaps underestimates the amount of effort required to maintain a service of that quality and reliability. I find this to be another symptom of HN tunnel vision.
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
"[...] he's displeased with what he sees as GitHub's high price for their lowest-tier paid account [...] " And I'm arguing that his displeasure with GitHub's price comes from the fact that he's underestimating the extra amount of time he will have to spend as a user of CodePlane because CodePlane is not remotely as polished as GitHub. I'm arguing that this extra amount of time will not be worth the difference in pric…
And I'm arguing that his displeasure with GitHub's price comes from the fact that he's underestimating the extra amount of time he will have to spend as a user of CodePlane because CodePlane is not remotely as polished as GitHub. I'm arguing that this extra amount of time will not be worth the difference in price. Yes, I get that. I just don't agree, and presumably he doesn't either. It's not just collaboration and w…
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#157Github's monthly fees are so much cheaper than the cost of your developers time and happiness.
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hg is marginally slower, but not so you'd really notice. If you're crunching 20,000-line files on a regular basis it might be a concern. On repos of that size, I doubt you'd notice. Git is a great tool for what it was built for and the group of users it was intended for--that is, rapid, tons-of-merges-and-pulls development on a gigantic codebase, for users for whom it is acceptable for man pages to serve as reminders…
The fact that all the tools can push to github make it easy to switch, which I just might do again. bzr was great, except for the fact that it just doesn't have that much traction...
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Github doesn't require you to know how to use tar ... or have any other Linux experience You don't need tar to package a git versioned project. All you need is some kind of zip program, and every major OS has one built in. The difference knowledge it requires to just zip up a directory and send it in an email, versus running a github connection is so minimal its laughable that anyone suggests that you need some kin…
Yes, you can zip up a repo easily. But where do you store it? Do you really want to save it in your email instead of saving it in some kind of source control so that you can use it as such if you need to quickly commit some change? Saving it to S3 is an option, but then you have to create that account too. Why shouldn't you be able to just use one account?
Re: Why I've built an alternative to Github
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have to be a hacker to know how to host a repo now?
Getting a Git repo setup with a web accessible interface is not trivial and for the time spent doing it, you could be doing other things like ... you know ... writing code to make you money.