Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
1–10 of 143 posts
Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#2Some of the nets will have disintegrated but surely some must have large pieces of them intact?
All the photos of the patch I've seen tend to be individual plastic items - bottles, cups etc. – so wondering if anyone's seen different
EDIT: Found this https://mymodernmet.com/ocean-voyages-institute-great-pacifi... the majority of 103 tons dredged up were fishing nets etc.
Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#3Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#4Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#5Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#6Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#7I guess this pretty much answers the question whether seaspiracy film is correct or not. People are trying to justify as if industry care about sustainable catching methods? Really? And there is common practise "The Solution to Pollution is Dilution" and there is no easy way to find how much industry is damaging ocean I bet its more than what Netflix Seaspiracy shows.
Imho Industry is more about earning $ rather than sustainable thing and most of the time the sustainable things are marketing PR strategy.
Remember Sugar Industry? Tobacco Industry? Looks like similar strategy this time too.
Re: Is Netflix's Seaspiracy film right about fishing damaging oceans?
#8Discrediting has been a great way to shut down people. Professors posting about research on tobacco were also discredited by big tobacco. This wouldnt be the first time !!