Interesting that here is yet another site that depends on IMDB in an essential way. I wonder what happens to that whole ecosystem if the database becomes more limited in how it can be accessed, or if it stops being updated and maintained in the same way.
An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
71–80 of 301 posts
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#72RNMA’s dive into electric, hybrid, and autonomous vehicles can be seen as a form of
Multiple Choice
mass customization.breakaway positioning.competitive parity.harvesting.reverse positioning. https://essaywritingg.us/blog/uncategorized/renault-electric...
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there are two dimensions. The personal consent one, where I do not agree with your opinion, but that's okay. On the other hand, copying a picture to another website can also be a copyright infringement.
How would you feel if you walked by a porn shop, and in the window you saw a magazine cover with a photo of you taken from your public social media accounts printed on the cover with the headline, "Hottest people on Instagram to get off to in 2021". Some people may be flattered by that, but many, many people would feel that it was a violation and an assault to their dignity.
If you look at this hypothetical case without prejudice, the only difference with your photo appearing on a news site, in someone's post on social media, as a picture on some forum or just being uploaded to image sharing service is for-profit nature of the usage.
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if it was just text links to the instagram accounts? What if it was iframes?
Again, legal, but not a nice or decent thing to do.
So, OK basically? Indecent things are allowed. You can criticize them, of course, but they are still allowed.
People have the right to write non-nice things about you (as long as it's not libel). They can write that they don't like you for whatever reason, or they can write that they get off thinking about you. There's freedom of expression to do stupid, non-nice and indecent shit.
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#75Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#76Note to self: never get a page on IMDB. Not that there is any risk...
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not agree. These are photos posted publicly on Instagram or Facebook. Anyone could see them. This website just aggregates them, but there's technically a live link to these pictures. And no, the fact that someone uploads them to a service whose ToS they have accepted makes no difference. You're posting something publicly? To me that's explicit consent that you want people to see them. If those pics were behind e…
When I upload photos to Instagram, I am not explicitly consenting to my photos being used for people's fetishes, even privately. I can't stop people from doing what they want privately with my public photos, and I know that, but I still find it morally wrong and disturbing. But I'm not sure that it's legal to republish someone's public Instagram photos on another website either. I'm no legal expert, but I believe it'…
At least in EU - the platform is responsible for the content their users upload.
So based on that posting personal information like address, name, age etc. Without consent can put this site out of business after few fines.
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#78Great article- I appreciate how pleasant both parties were! Some of us, admittedly, like women with nice ass. I think feet is less creepy if you really think about it. But to each to their own!
Liking people's bodies isn't creepy.
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, legal, but not a nice or decent thing to do.
So, OK basically? Indecent things are allowed. You can criticize them, of course, but they are still allowed. People have the right to write non-nice things about you (as long as it's not libel). They can write that they don't like you for whatever reason, or they can write that they get off thinking about you. There's freedom of expression to do stupid, non-nice and indecent shit.
No one is saying it's not legal. Most people here understand what libel is and what freedom of expression is.
The point is that it's still a bit weird, creepy and unpleasant. This man can continue doing it, and I can continue thinking he's quite damaged.
Re: An interview with the man who keeps uploading my feet to WikiFeet
#80TIL there's a wiki website for foot fetishists. I believe everyone has a right to their own fetishes. Nothing wrong with being into feet. But the thing that really puts me off about this interview and the WikiFeet website is the lack of consent. Uploading photos of someone without their consent is wrong. The fact that the purpose is to satisfy a fetish adds an extra layer of creepy. Regardless of how the interviewer…
[deleted]