Live data from Hacker News

Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

opensource.cooking

61–70 of 169 posts

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#61

There's a recipe on your site called Refried Beans. I've never heard of that dish, but in any case, either the recipe is wrong, or the name is. The recipe only calls for frying the beans once.

From Wikipedia:

> As described by Rick Bayless, "they're refritos—not fried again, as you might assume, but "well fried" or "intensely fried," as that re translates from Spanish.

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#62
In general I've given up on recipe aggregate sites. I have to be half-familiar with the dish just to fix all the things wrong with the recipes I find. In my opinion, divorcing the recipe from the curator is a huge mistake and no amount of user reviews overcomes this. What I really want to see are the recipes that some specific person actually makes in their daily life. Not icons who publish more recipes under their name than a single person could make in a lifetime, or test kitchens obsessed with creating the scientifically proven ideal form of a chocolate chip cookie, and definitely not bloggers churning out stories to grow an audience. I want John, who likes to cook, to let me leaf around in his recipe box (the one he actually uses), and if I make a dish and like it I want to be able to go back and dig around for more. I know this authenticity exists online, but I don't know how to find it. I imagine it as a big list of personal recipe box websites.

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#64
post #8

So as someone who cooks a lot, and gets frustrated by long blog like posts that lots of recipes have this day, this website is probably even less useful for me. The tagging system isn't being used correctly, Ham Sandwich is tagged with Banana for some reason. Speaking of Ham sandwich some of the recipes are just way too simple, this just tells me how to assemble a sandwich which I don't think anyone really needs. Tho…

Yes it really does need some work. There is a need for a simple well curated recipe site though, there is always lots of interest.

I’ve found nothing better than the NYT Cooking site. High quality recipes well indexed, well formatted. Not ridiculously overwhelmed with ads.

Alas, not free -- but for my money, well worth it.

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#65
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes it really does need some work. There is a need for a simple well curated recipe site though, there is always lots of interest.

Honest question: What is your problem with traditional cookbooks like "Le guide culinaire"[0]? They are a curated source of recipes which stood the test of time. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_guide_culinaire

Not OP, but I’ve got no problem with them. In fact given how bad most recipe websites are, I’ve largely returned to them.

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#67
post #62

In general I've given up on recipe aggregate sites. I have to be half-familiar with the dish just to fix all the things wrong with the recipes I find. In my opinion, divorcing the recipe from the curator is a huge mistake and no amount of user reviews overcomes this. What I really want to see are the recipes that some specific person actually makes in their daily life. Not icons who publish more recipes under their n…

[deleted]

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#69

There's a recipe on your site called Refried Beans. I've never heard of that dish, but in any case, either the recipe is wrong, or the name is. The recipe only calls for frying the beans once.

It's a false cognate for the Spanish 'frijoles refritos'.

Frito = fried, but re is an "intensifier" that can mean "done again" but may also mean "done thoroughly" or even "in excess". Thus, they are beans that have been fried thoroughly.

Re: Opensource.cooking: A simple, bloat-free cooking site

#70
post #66

Open source is nice but these recipes need to be stored on the blockchain

Wanna buy the NFT for my chocolate chip cookies?

You laugh, but I've heard that NFTs taste better than the actual cookies they vaguely represent in JSON form.
Post reply on HN