Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why isn't this actionable? We are currently making significant public and private investments into electric cars based on their reduced emissions. Why not also invest in cycling infrastructure (beyond the very limited capacity that most US cities are currently doing)?
Because most US cities are not compact and flat as Copenhagen
Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
21–30 of 764 posts
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#22That's great. Assuming the following: - Your commute is sufficiently short - You have facilities to shower and dress at work - You have sufficient time to shower and dress at work - You don't have to bring kids or sizable cargo - Weather is sufficiently good - You're sufficiently healthy
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why isn't this actionable? We are currently making significant public and private investments into electric cars based on their reduced emissions. Why not also invest in cycling infrastructure (beyond the very limited capacity that most US cities are currently doing)?
There is no evidence to suggest millions of bicycle commuters are waiting in the wings for more green paint.
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#24I wonder if telecommuting like many are doing right now trumps everything .
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why isn't this actionable? We are currently making significant public and private investments into electric cars based on their reduced emissions. Why not also invest in cycling infrastructure (beyond the very limited capacity that most US cities are currently doing)?
Because most US cities are not compact and flat as Copenhagen
Of course summer commuting in Houston or Phoenix is going to suck no matter what your bike is
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#26That's great. Assuming the following: - Your commute is sufficiently short - You have facilities to shower and dress at work - You have sufficient time to shower and dress at work - You don't have to bring kids or sizable cargo - Weather is sufficiently good - You're sufficiently healthy
- You live somewhere warm enough to bike year-round.
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t get it where is the emission coming from bicycle trips?
I guess you have to eat a bit more if you ride more, I certainly notice when I bike to work (5mi each way, 300ft climb) that I need to eat a bit more food. Certainly no where near the energy of a car though but its not zero. Assuming you want to maintain your weight.
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#28The headline claim as laid out in the article: > we found that emissions from cycling can be more than 30 times lower for each trip than driving a fossil fuel car, and about ten times lower than driving an electric one Assuming we’re comparing single occupant passenger vehicles to bicycles (incl. e-bikes), this seems fairly self-evident and hardly actionable. > We observed around 4,000 people living in London, Antwer…
I don’t get it where is the emission coming from bicycle trips?
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#29I wonder if telecommuting like many are doing right now trumps everything .
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09658...
Re: Cycling is more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no evidence to suggest millions of bicycle commuters are waiting in the wings for more green paint.
I am. Cycling in the city is dangerous.