Earlier quoted context omitted.
From a physicists standpoint, not seeing something unexpected is not a waste at all.
Can you expand on that? I was under the impression that many thought of it as a waste (Sabine Hossenfelder comes to mind, for example).
Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
51–60 of 301 posts
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#52Physics noob question: is there any physical framework that does away with the concept of "force"? I know a bit about how it is reconceptualized as space-time deformation in the context of general relativity, but that's about it. It just seems like one of those inherently anthropocentric concepts that (potentially) holds us back from exploring something different?
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#53Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#54Nature seems to have this interesting property of always increasing in perceived complexity.
Infinite playground.
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#55Honestly feel sorry for particle physicists... Their entire gig is spending billions on fancy equipment, and hoping that observe something unexpected. If they see exactly what they expected to see, all that effort was basically wasted. Also, a lot of "discoveries" turn out to be equipment miscalibration - remember those particles which supposedly moved faster than light a few years back? Always struck me as an odd wa…
This is progress. Sometimes science takes two steps back and one step forward. Sometimes that one step is bigger than you realized. And it wasn't backwards, it was projecting into a different spacial dimension. Or something.
The point is, this is probably good news, honestly.
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#56Physics noob question: is there any physical framework that does away with the concept of "force"? I know a bit about how it is reconceptualized as space-time deformation in the context of general relativity, but that's about it. It just seems like one of those inherently anthropocentric concepts that (potentially) holds us back from exploring something different?
(F=ma being replaced by Schrodinger's equation.)
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#57What is everyones favorite book on quantum mechanics (I would love understand more of the 3 generations of matter)?
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#58Physics noob question: is there any physical framework that does away with the concept of "force"? I know a bit about how it is reconceptualized as space-time deformation in the context of general relativity, but that's about it. It just seems like one of those inherently anthropocentric concepts that (potentially) holds us back from exploring something different?
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#59Can anyone recommend any pop-sci books? I haven't taken a science class since high school, and that is barely remembered. Mostly interested in getting philosophically up to date with the state of matter(?), it's different types, how these objects interact.
That and quantum shenanigans, but that comes down to "we can't transport information faster than light."
Re: Particle mystery: physicists confirm the muon is more magnetic than predicted
#60Nature seems to have this interesting property of always increasing in perceived complexity.
Wouldn't that be amazing if the universe developed more and more characteristics as you look for them? Or even, that it's pushed to create something when you do? Infinite playground.