Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

bbc.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

211–220 of 220 posts

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#211

Post by NathanielK »

edrxty wrote: post #153
gregmac wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some more: Change their profile photo (github/slack/etc). Flip their monitor orientation. Swap to left-handed mouse buttons (or vice-versa). Go on Amazon and add some "interesting" things to their wishlist/cart. Go on Youtube and "like" a bunch of random videos.

I miss the good old days of Vista where there was a straight keyboard command to change monitor orientation. It was something like win+shift+arrow so everyone would prank each other with it until it was removed.

I remember that. Part of the Intel Graphics driver kit. W10 is pretty good about including basic drivers so that is probably when it stopped working for you. The shortcut still works for anyone who's gone through the hassle of installing Intel's drivers.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#213

Post by libraryatnight »

Guest42 wrote: post #104
kube-system wrote: post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the culture of being engaged with the public is more of a good thing than a bad thing, regardless of how 'useful' it is.

Personally, I think my brain gets tired of having to filter non-stop PR. Actual engagement would be fantastic though so as much as that exists I’d claim provides a good potential.

I'm particularly tired of military PR.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#214

Post by quantified »

Mindless2112 wrote: post #196
scarecrowbob wrote: post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do some work for gov website that is more or less a PR blog. Although you can't do anything to the systems that this agency deals with via the back end to this website, the scope of abuses that someone could engage in if they had these credentials is quite broad, ranging from "Agency XYZ endorses PQR" to "Agency XYZ will begin action against LMN". Or, if you can't see the implications of that ability, consider that…

"My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_begin_bombing_in_five_minut...

Hawaii, prepare to be attacked.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42677604

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#215

Post by legacynl »

whack wrote: post #148

The responsible agency is rightfully embarrassed by this oversight, and has now taken stringent measures to ensure something like this never happens again - Henceforth, all tweets can only ever be sent from a remote-desktop server that has to be hosted in a security-clearance-5 site - In order to access the remote-desktop, 2 government employees, who both have 10+ years of government experience, will need to jointly…

> In other news, why does it cost the government so much money, and take so long, to get anything done!? Stay tuned for more.

Don't be ridiculous. Every organization has protocols in place. It might seem inherently wasteful, but they actually save money by preventing costly mistakes.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#216

Post by ThePowerOfFuet »

airhead969 wrote: post #2

Isn't the automatic reaction of a Windows desktop/laptop user to lock their workstation (Ctrl-Alt-Del, Enter, Enter) if they leave for any reason? Edit: that was a great Chaos Monkey to reiterate security hygiene. Or was it a Mini Chaos Monkey? https://netflix.github.io/chaosmonkey/

>Ctrl-Alt-Del, Enter, Enter

Win+L.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#217

Post by ChoGGi »

salawat wrote: post #162
whoisthemachine wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you mis-stated that last line: > Leave US Strategic Command Launch Portal open for child to launch missiles against Ontario, Canada: "Canada: Totally okay, these things happen."

I was 50/49.9/.1 the correction would be Canada being okay with Ontario being nuked, or the target changing to Quebec and Canada still being okay with it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_sovereignty_movement Quebec is the Texas of Canada, if I recall correctly. There was a third, though unlikely option of the target switching to Alberta, but it turning out to be okay, because it just happened to coincide with…

As someone from Ontario who moved to Alberta, you deserve a Chinook when it's -30 out.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#218

Post by 29athrowaway »

bradknowles wrote: post #200
29athrowaway wrote: post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The room where the tweeting designated computer is located is painted with anti wifi paint. No communication devices are allowed in the room and is protected by armed guards disguised as plants. Submitting the tweet requires turning two keys at the same time, the keys are reissued every 24 hours. The password to unlock the computer is written with invisible ink in a microfilm contained inside a spy coin in a fake boo…

And the mandatory password for the account will be permanently locked to “00000000”.

For decades, the launch codes were codes consisting of all zeroes.

Re: Child tweets gibberish from US nuclear-agency account

#219

Post by gnulinux »

taejo wrote: post #117
gnulinux wrote: post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a genuine question, I'm really curious. What if the kid typed something that implies "US is firing nukes to {insert random non-Western country}". What is the probability of something like that escalating?

It wouldn't be completely unprecedented: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_begin_bombing_in_five_minut...

I didn't know this but this so scandalous. I don't even understand what's funny about going through a potentially species-ending war.
Post reply on HN