BS is called in the comments section of this article
Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
21–30 of 34 posts
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#22Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is it not interesting that these ratios turn out to be aesthetically pleasing over and over again? To me, that's fascinating.
As far as I know, It's not known whether this is a causal relationship. It's possible that art that uses the golden ratio tends to be viewed as beautiful because of some magical aesthetic property of the GR, and that artists create art using this ratio intuitively. But it's also possible that artists (and especially designers) tend to use it a lot just because they've heard that it's beautiful, when really it's nothi…
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#24Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#25http://www.macrumors.com/2011/06/16/icloud-logo-infused-with... BS is called in the comments section of this article
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#26http://www.macrumors.com/2011/06/16/icloud-logo-infused-with... BS is called in the comments section of this article
Here's the comment by cheesymogul: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=12774665#post12...
Sounds like a testable claim to me.
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#27As far as I know there is no scientific evidence which would prove that people prefer artworks that are aligned to golden ratio proportions. In other words - golden ratio is pure pseudoscience when used in context of design: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/pseudo/fibonacc.htm
The part followed by:
> One of these has been stretched vertically 20%, or reduced vertically 20%. Which one do you find most pleasing? Most dramatic? Most like the real thing?
The one on the left is more pleasing to me. The one on the right looks garish. The one on the right is the stretched one right? In fact they both look distorted to me, I believe the images also are being scaled to irregular proportions by the HTML. A direct link to the source image of the one on the left looks correct to me: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/pseudo/nashv.jpg But I'm no expert and maybe I'm making a fool of myself.
But going back to the author's intention, I read the sentence I quoted several times, and I still don't know what his preference is. The fact that he said "most dramatic" makes me think he prefer the one on the right?
With respect to using the golden ratio in design. I am a designer. I've never used the golden ratio, but I understand the desire to. As design is discipline with very few rules, we latch onto anything concrete, whether the benefits are real or imaginary. Otherwise it just feels like shooting in the dark. While I'm agnostic on whether the golden ratio is actually objectively attractive or not, the benefits of using a framework like this I find to be invaluable.
Here is what I mean: lets say you use the golden ratio to layout out a blog, i.e., place the logo, main content, sidebar, etc... Then you use the golden ratio again to layout an individual blog post, i.e., the header, the text of the post, maybe a pull quote, and some inline images. Now you've done something I can attest to the benefits of, because you've created a harmonious repetition of proportion through-out the design. When I look back at my own design work, the strongest dividing line between the work I am proud of and the work I am no longer proud of, is just this. When I started using a concrete system to repeat proportion through out the design, to my admittedly subjective eye, the quality of my design work greatly increased.
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#28I get the impression that designers just use the golden ratio as a very quick way to choose different sizes for objects and layouts. It's really not that interesting.
How is it not interesting that these ratios turn out to be aesthetically pleasing over and over again? To me, that's fascinating.
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's the comment by cheesymogul: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=12774665#post12...
Therefore you can take any 10 good logos or designs, or even well composed photos, and you'll probably find in 7 out of them the golden ratio implemented somehow! Sounds like a testable claim to me.
Re: Apple’s iCloud Icon Uses The Golden Ratio
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is it not interesting that these ratios turn out to be aesthetically pleasing over and over again? To me, that's fascinating.
It's confusing, if you assume that our preferences are totally arbitrary. If 'liking the golden ratio' is a property of being human, it's profound, but not confusing. Thing is that the ideal might not be the golden ratio. Maybe we prefer pi/2 instead of (1 + sqrt(5)) / 2. Who's to say? Pi/2 is if anything -more- fundamental. It seems to be that we don't like things to look too square or too oblong, which limits us to…
For example, being right or left handed doesn't seem to have any particular advantage, as long as your handedness is the same as everyone else. It seems like humans have arbitrarily "chosen" right-handedness. :)