Live data from Hacker News

Inside a viral website

notfunatparties.substack.com

291–300 of 305 posts

Re: Inside a viral website

#291
post #226

One thing I don't understand about monetizing on the Internet. I see the author considered ads, tried an affiliate scheme and even did an NFT. But what about plain old, honest to God payment? Couldn't they just put a paragraph of text on the site, "Hey folks, I'm worried about hosting costs, if you find this page useful, please [Donate]", with a button redirecting to Paypal or Stripe or whatever, collect the money an…

For Bucket Brigade I ask for donations [1] which has covered about 50% of my costs so far [2]. I think how well this works depends a lot on how useful people find your site vs what your costs are? [1] https://echo.jefftk.com/#About [2] https://www.jefftk.com/bucket-brigade-payments

I wouldn't say it works if it doesn't even support your running costs.

A website I live from generates about 50€ per month in donations.

Re: Inside a viral website

#292
post #128
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NFT is just a joke went too far. I'm starting to consider creating a NFT to sell NFTs of NFTs emitted elsewhere. Or one for people who doesn't "own an asset" to sell it.

NFT-backed securities are both inevitable and worrying.

LOL ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: Inside a viral website

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's all true but it means that you need to market your person, become an "internet personality" just to collect donations on something technical that you built It works, true, eg Andrew Kelley is funding his Zig work that way and it's pretty amazing to see him ace it. But damn you gotta be a particular kind of person to not get extremely stressed out about that prospect.

Ah, you've beet me to it skrebbel. :) I actually wanted to write something like this. It's really hard to be what you are (in my case - a very introverted and private person), give something valuable to the world and actually live from that. That would be a beautiful life, really. p.s. Not saying there are no people who didn't manage to pull it off, but I'm pretty sure those people are exceptions rather than the rule…

fwiw I'm super extroverted and I still get stressed out about the idea of becoming an internet personality :-)

Re: Inside a viral website

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand your point, but this is just a plain old subscription.

Yes. It's a plain old subscription in the same way that using a card linked to your iPhone or Android phone to pay for a subscription through their app stores is a plain old subscription. That is, it comes with lots of advantages through being part of an ecosystem that people may already be part of or at least have some trust in because it is well known. Additionally it's already associated with helping people and pr…

It’s plain old subscription in that it’s gated. The original comment was recommending asking for donations at the end of a post

Re: Inside a viral website

#296
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit gold seems to fit here. It makes no sense to me but it seems to be working. I find it funny the threads complaining about Reddit's recent horrible hiring an mod decisions all had TONS of gold lol

Reddit gold makes tons of sense. People can pay money to amplify the opinions they want amplified. Reddit actually monetized internet arguing.

Sorry I meant it makes no sense for redditers to buy gold for posts that they are specifically calling out Reddit for bad behavior

Re: Inside a viral website

#297
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit gold makes tons of sense. People can pay money to amplify the opinions they want amplified. Reddit actually monetized internet arguing.

Sorry I meant it makes no sense for redditers to buy gold for posts that they are specifically calling out Reddit for bad behavior

Sure it does. They want to amplify that opinion. They think that calling out Reddit is worth the negative of paying money to Reddit.

Re: Inside a viral website

#298
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only in the aggregate. The site owner doesn't know who purchased what. Only Amazon (obviously) knows. The site owner only sees that 35 people bought book X while 24 people bought book Y.

Anonymous data can easily become identifiable when it's small enough, as GP was saying. If someone runs a tiny blog that they attempt to monetize with affiliate links, and one of their only readers at the moment is their mother, I don't think they'd be happy seeing that one of their readers purchased a sex toy.

This is exactly the right approach. Anything specific enough can be traced back to an individual.

Re: Inside a viral website

#299
post #161

It's a bit of a time limited joke and not a business. If it was done as a business and ad heavy it wouldn't be shared so much. Seems to me the best monetisation he could do is selling himself. Even a couple hours work off the back of it would have been beating any ad's etc. I had a minor web hit in the 90s, tried to do affiliate links etc but nothing really worked but I did get a little bit of work from it that has b…

Good perspective. This blog post is a start. If I were him, I'd try to get my fifteen minutes in the press. Whenever a prospective employer searches his name even years in the future, they'll see "this guy made a really popular website!" That's great marketing.

Re: Inside a viral website

#300

One thing I don't understand about monetizing on the Internet. I see the author considered ads, tried an affiliate scheme and even did an NFT. But what about plain old, honest to God payment? Couldn't they just put a paragraph of text on the site, "Hey folks, I'm worried about hosting costs, if you find this page useful, please [Donate]", with a button redirecting to Paypal or Stripe or whatever, collect the money an…

I’m genuinely interested in how one would pull $0.5MM in donations from a one-off meme site. Why would one donate to such a site?
Post reply on HN