Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
11–20 of 29 posts
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pandora isn't bleeding cash.
"Pandora is by far the leading Internet radio service, with 80 million registered users, but it has yet to earn a profit and nearly half of its revenues go toward paying royalties to be able to stream music, fees that are set to escalate over the next four years. It had losses of $328,000 in the nine months ending Oct. 31." From an article dating Feb 14th, this year: http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118032185?refCat…
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#13Pandora is still massively overpriced at $16/share. I reckon a price at $2/share would still be a significant gamble: http://shortlogic.tumblr.com/post/6586713689/pandora-should-...
Remember, there's a big difference between a lifestyle business and a startup. A startup knows how to grow and do so creatively. A lifestyle business has no such inclination, and those involved with such efforts tend to think about other businesses in a narrow manner.
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're profitable?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-10433355-261.html Looks like they recently turned their first quarterly profit. I love Pandora. It's the app that's being run the most on all my machines (laptop/desktop/android). In my eyes it's completely overpowered things like satellite radio. Google Music is nice, too, but only if you have a large existing library of music, and in my recent experience it's been very slow to jump…
http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/16/tc-teardown-pandora-the-tou...
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#15Pandora is still massively overpriced at $16/share. I reckon a price at $2/share would still be a significant gamble: http://shortlogic.tumblr.com/post/6586713689/pandora-should-...
That post is skewed and narrow-minded. Pandora is in places most people don't realize, and has growth opportunities the poster is not taking into account. Remember, there's a big difference between a lifestyle business and a startup. A startup knows how to grow and do so creatively. A lifestyle business has no such inclination, and those involved with such efforts tend to think about other businesses in a narrow mann…
How about dishing concrete examples of all these places they're in that's going to make them as astonishingly profitable as they need to be to justify a $2.5B valuation?
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#16Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
That post is skewed and narrow-minded. Pandora is in places most people don't realize, and has growth opportunities the poster is not taking into account. Remember, there's a big difference between a lifestyle business and a startup. A startup knows how to grow and do so creatively. A lifestyle business has no such inclination, and those involved with such efforts tend to think about other businesses in a narrow mann…
Hahaha. That's your argument? "They're in many places and you wouldn't understand why they're so valuable if you have a 'lifestyle' business". How about dishing concrete examples of all these places they're in that's going to make them as astonishingly profitable as they need to be to justify a $2.5B valuation?
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hahaha. That's your argument? "They're in many places and you wouldn't understand why they're so valuable if you have a 'lifestyle' business". How about dishing concrete examples of all these places they're in that's going to make them as astonishingly profitable as they need to be to justify a $2.5B valuation?
How about not assuming a company that just IPOed is at the end of its road but instead will continue innovating and finding new revenue streams? They did just raise $200MM after all.
Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#19Re: Pandora Pop Is Gone Day After IPO
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hahaha. That's your argument? "They're in many places and you wouldn't understand why they're so valuable if you have a 'lifestyle' business". How about dishing concrete examples of all these places they're in that's going to make them as astonishingly profitable as they need to be to justify a $2.5B valuation?
How about not assuming a company that just IPOed is at the end of its road but instead will continue innovating and finding new revenue streams? They did just raise $200MM after all.