What a surprise it didn’t need nuclear ordinance or building giant elaborate dams or millions of helicopters.
Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
251–260 of 593 posts
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#252Lots of articles quote a $XXX billion dollars per day figure, but those numbers are normally for "worth of goods delayed" which, while interesting, doesn't tell the story to me. Are there any estimates as to the actual cost of this "mishap", due to e.g. spoilage, financial/contractual repercussions of late deliveries, personnel/fuel costs?
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#253Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#254Oh hey, they fixed it, - without destroying or imposing significant additional damage to any of the cargo - without destroying or imposing significant additional damage to the ship - without taking multiple weeks - without needing to ship a trillion dollars'+ worth of equipment halfway around the world It's refreshing to see high-end engineering performed so competently.
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair: Maersk, biggest shipping company in the world also came to the conclusion that it will take longer and sent their ships the way around africa. It's always a gamble and every outcome has it's probabilities.
that may still be the right choice given that now there is a huge backlog
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#256Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#257“ Oil prices remained volatile, however, amid concerns to the time it may take to clear the almost 500 ship backlog and expectations that OPEC members will hold their production cut agreement in place following their monthly meeting in Vienna later this week.” Such a perfect time for Democrats to play politics with energy. Wheee! Everyone get ready to bend over.
Not really sure a political conclusion is warranted here.
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#258Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#259Oh hey, they fixed it, - without destroying or imposing significant additional damage to any of the cargo - without destroying or imposing significant additional damage to the ship - without taking multiple weeks - without needing to ship a trillion dollars'+ worth of equipment halfway around the world It's refreshing to see high-end engineering performed so competently.
There appears to be little "high-end engineering." Just a high tide and a bunch of tug boats.
Re: Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded ship refloated
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, I used to think that HN was a collection of some of the smartest people on the Internet. Don’t get me wrong, there are some incredible people here. But I guess what I have learned over the past 10 years is that HN has as many blind spots as any other online forum. If you want SV advice, this is the place to be. If you want to dislodge a stuck mega ship, look elsewhere.
The smartest ones are maybe not the ones providing suggestions? Then again, it's fun to speculate, and what are these threads for if not to provoke thought? Maybe it's fine for people to imagine and try to put themselves in the place of the professionals working on the problem. You can interpret the comments here as an indicator of dangerous human hubris if you want, but I think most of the people here understand tha…