Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why would this guy give up real money to defend them? Dr. Gebru has a lot of support among the professor's peers in AI ethics; accepting the award would paint a target on his back. Edited for clarity.
Dr. Gebru is a she
A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#42From my understanding of the events, there was not really anything wrong with the way Google handled the AI Ethics researchers it fired. One threatened to quit unless a long list of demands were met. The other was exfiltrating company data. Why would this guy give up real money to defend them?
This elevates him in his field, which isn't CS.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#43Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#44Of FAANG, Apple and Netflix aren't nearly as evil as the others.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#45“Luke Stark declined a $60,000 research award from Google in support of the ousted leaders of its ethical AI group.” Ugh...I’m all for standing up for what you believe in, but I think he was foolish for turning down this money.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#46“Luke Stark declined a $60,000 research award from Google in support of the ousted leaders of its ethical AI group.” Ugh...I’m all for standing up for what you believe in, but I think he was foolish for turning down this money.
Visiting Gebru's Twitter reveals that he is, for now, getting a lot of positive attention for his decision, which could be more valuable to him.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#47Equity is not equality.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#48I respect the gesture but I think it would be more useful if accompanied with some plan of action for improving the current state of ethics in CS. It's a field-wide problem, not a Google specific problem. Also, let's be clear here on who bears the brunt of these actions - when a lab is short on funding, it's the grad students who lose out first. Vijay tweeted as much, saying he'd rather his grad students need to TA a…
Also, you can't make people more ethical with a course. It doesn't work like that. People either have a semblance of a moral compass or they don't, and unfortunately I think there is less and less big-picture moral courage and critical thinking amongst the majority of knowledge workers. Maybe it's the way people were raised in the past 30 years, e.g., latchkey kids who grew up feral without mentors or active parental involvement due to two full-time working parents.
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Money is to fund research, not personal use. Job security highly dependent on bringing in grants.
Yes, this is an important point, thank you. The research award goes to the university, not personally to the researcher (at least so says the award information at [1]). Nevertheless, I think this guy will have other opportunities and this grant isn't going to make or break him. [1] https://research.google/outreach/research-scholar-program/
Re: A professor declined a $60K research award from Google
#50Personally, I refuse to work for Google no matter how many $100k's or flexibility in role design and department choices they throw at me. This is because "don't be evil" was only an ostensible mission statement that has long since fell by the wayside since it obviously never was a primary value. Of FAANG, Apple and Netflix aren't nearly as evil as the others.
Did you hear about the most recent debacle in India where Apple factory workers weren't getting paid their $3 USD monthly wages on time?
The fact that this trillion dollar company does this is pure evil.