Live data from Hacker News

Is that ship still stuck?

istheshipstillstuck.com

471–480 of 1001 posts

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#472

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had the exact same idea but the canal bank is very shallow.. so you would have to build around the whole ship (as you said). This also seems like a major undertaking. I am excited to see how they will solve the problem though!

You might end up getting it stuck higher . Then what?

if we keep going then the other ships can just duck.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#473
post #388

Just another non-expert, but I wonder if the simplest approach might be to pump water under it to wash away the sand it's beached on. Googling, it seems that this is a recognised technique for dredging: https://www.iadc-dredging.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/fac... Whether it works might be dependent on what kind of soil its sitting on and whether the current is strong enough to take away the dislodged particles. I…

Can someone explain why dredging alone isn't sufficient? Is it too slow?

Really deep keel in not much water. At shore zero water. Ie It’s properly stuck

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#474
post #467

Site author here, I guess this is why the New York Times API keeps hitting rate limits.

Cool! How much traffic are you handling at the moment / at peak?

I actually have no idea. It was just a bit of fun so I haven't got any logs/analytics set up at all.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#475
post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Strap it to a Falcon Heavy.

How many falcon heavies would we need to lift 200,000 metric tons?

Apparently Falcon Heavy has 5 million lbs of thrust, so about 88 Falcon Heavies?

SuperHeavy will have 17 million lbs of thrust so if Elon could deliver 25 SuperHeavy boosters with a total of 700 Raptor engines it could lift the Ever Given? Someone should simulate this in Kerbal.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#477
post #39

I don't think people are giving enough credit to how stuck the ship is. Look at some of the photos of the front of it. Look at how far out of the water it is sitting. The ship might look like that if it were totally empty, but not when it is full of containers like this. Some people saying: just drag it off of the sand. Okay! And what happens when that causes you to rip a hole into the hull of the ship? Now it's real…

Could you build a temporary barrier around the ship and the section of the canal, bring in some massive pumps, and temporarily raise the water level around the ship? Edit: Something like this https://www.hydrologicalsolutions.com/aqua-barrier-cofferdam...

Wow that link - well thats a clever system! I would have never come up with something like that yet it's so simple in hindsight!

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#478
post #446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Again the infrastructure to do this rapidly doesn't exist. The UAE used several sand-vacuuming ships to build their artificial islands, wouldn't those do the job?

The dredging for that project was done by a Belgian and a Dutch company, and I don't think they left their ships and equipment there afterwards.

It also took many years.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#480
post #388

Just another non-expert, but I wonder if the simplest approach might be to pump water under it to wash away the sand it's beached on. Googling, it seems that this is a recognised technique for dredging: https://www.iadc-dredging.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/fac... Whether it works might be dependent on what kind of soil its sitting on and whether the current is strong enough to take away the dislodged particles. I…

Can someone explain why dredging alone isn't sufficient? Is it too slow?

I expect dredging will be the main solution. Dredges are just slow moving, so they’ve taken a while to arrive.

I’d also expect some long reach excavators and/or draglines to be working from the shore and/or barges.

They probably just underestimated the stuckedness at first. Throw in some ineptitude and corruption, and you have this royal mess.

Post reply on HN