Where are the screenshots?? How infuriating is it to go to a project's homepage that has a UI and not see any goddamn screenshots. This is absolutely table stakes if you want me to use your product. edit: Oh haha, the website is literally Fossil. Ok but I wanna see what the chat UI and other stuff looks like.
Fossil Chat
41–50 of 172 posts
Re: Fossil Chat
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
What web server do you use?
Caddy, though I have used NGINX and HAProxy in the past. I get your point, but those projects have corporate backing and a lot of scrutiny. A niche C project seems less likely to have that.
Re: Fossil Chat
#43HI! What it looks like: https://imgur.com/a/PaHExsp Here's Fossil 2.15 running on EC2: http://54.79.202.57/register - this link will allow you to create a new account. Alternatively, the "chat" user (password "chat") can be used if you don't want to make an account. [It used to have the ability to create additional users (with admin privs), with the result that the fossil instance rapidly began spouting SQL errors an…
Re: Fossil Chat
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they're cdevs.
I think you mean cdvs, the e is clearly overkill, takes up more bytes on disk, increases compile times and eats up valuable screen real estate! The last one is especially bad, because it will make the code that uses it harder to read.
Re: Fossil Chat
#45Re: Fossil Chat
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they're cdevs.
I think you mean cdvs, the e is clearly overkill, takes up more bytes on disk, increases compile times and eats up valuable screen real estate! The last one is especially bad, because it will make the code that uses it harder to read.
Also one more extra letter to type for people who can type 100+ words per minute and over an entire day probably only need to type 2 words per minute on average (the rest of the time spent thinking, debugging, reading documentation, being in meetings, etc) :-)
Re: Fossil Chat
#47> Fossil chat is not intended as a replacement or competitor for So what is it for? If it's another inbox to check that's a bit of a productivity drain. I could understand if it was explicitly designed to compete with other chat platforms. This would seem to fit with Fossil's mission well.
> Fossil chat is designed for use by insiders - people with check-in privileges or higher. It is not intended as a general-purpose gathering place for random passers-by on the internet. Fossil chat seeks to provide a communication venue for discussion that does not become part of the permanent record for the project. For persistent and durable discussion, use the Forum. Because the conversation is intended to be ephe…
Re: Fossil Chat
#48HI! What it looks like: https://imgur.com/a/PaHExsp Here's Fossil 2.15 running on EC2: http://54.79.202.57/register - this link will allow you to create a new account. Alternatively, the "chat" user (password "chat") can be used if you don't want to make an account. [It used to have the ability to create additional users (with admin privs), with the result that the fossil instance rapidly began spouting SQL errors an…
Not able to login a chat:chat
Realizes people can change the password woops argh
OK. Because Fossil is awesome you can disallow people from changing their own passwords, while also making it possible to create further accounts that can change their own passwords. Nice!
[EDIT: A few misconceptions here. No, you can't do the above; if a user couldn't change their password but could create new admin accounts, said new admin account could just change the initial user pw.]
Re: Fossil Chat
#49fossil: messaging over version control
Re: Fossil Chat
#50HI! What it looks like: https://imgur.com/a/PaHExsp Here's Fossil 2.15 running on EC2: http://54.79.202.57/register - this link will allow you to create a new account. Alternatively, the "chat" user (password "chat") can be used if you don't want to make an account. [It used to have the ability to create additional users (with admin privs), with the result that the fossil instance rapidly began spouting SQL errors an…
Too bad it isn't allowed for logged-in anonymous users to chat (though that would be confusing!)