Why are people still on Chrome? Just use a browser whose interests align with yours, like Firefox.
Chrome (aside from the ad company spying) has better security than any other browser, Firefox included, by a substantial margin.
Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
71–80 of 369 posts
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#72 ;;; The @b{urlskip} Racket library provides a function that translates some of
;;; the Web URLs that might be used to track a user across sites, by removing
;;; intermediate HTTP redirectors or information that might identify the user.
;;; Such a function might be used as part of a privacy-enhancing Web browser,
;;; or to canonicalize or un-obfuscate URLs for Web analysis projects.
;;;
;;; Note that @b{urlskip} is not intended to remove information used by
;;; ``affiliate'' referral programs to identify site operators that have sent
;;; users to a site. However, in some cases this affiliate ID information
;;; might be lost in the process of removing a intermediary URL that is used by
;;; a third party to track and profile users.
It had special-case handlers for various URL server authorities and the paths under them. So, for http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=AAA&creative=111&camp=222\
&link_code=bn1&path=asin/b333
it was coded to preserve only certain query parameters, like: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=AAA&path=asin/b333
A lot of the cases it handled were redirectors, which usually meant only the target URL, which was usually in a query parameter, but might be in the path, and might or might not be URL-escaped. So, for example, http://www.google.com/url?sa=l&q=http://www.shopping.com/xGS-AAA_BBB~NS\
-1~linkin_id-111&ai=REALLYLONGNONSENSESTRING&num=3
would skip the redirector, to be simply: http://www.shopping.com/xGS-AAA_BBB~NS-1~linkin_id-111
I was going to link here to the code of `urlskip`, but it's no longer in the package repository where it used to be. (I added a lot of libraries to that repository, and don't recall whether there was some reason to remove this particular library.) It was a pretty niche library, and in a fringe language, so its impact might've only been as an example, pointing out that this could be done, and some rules for it.Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#73Pretty bad and ofcourse private company etc etc, but unfortunately since I mostly browse on mobile and: Safari no addons, Chrome no addons, FirefoxAndroid killed almost all addons. I had found here on HN that by using Kiwi browser I could import Chrome Desktop addons but now even this is adding more friction for my own good, apparently because obscure, legitimate looking, dark pattern coloured, reasons. All those bro…
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#74Pretty bad and ofcourse private company etc etc, but unfortunately since I mostly browse on mobile and: Safari no addons, Chrome no addons, FirefoxAndroid killed almost all addons. I had found here on HN that by using Kiwi browser I could import Chrome Desktop addons but now even this is adding more friction for my own good, apparently because obscure, legitimate looking, dark pattern coloured, reasons. All those bro…
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extensio...
Firefox Nightly for Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fe...
Fennec F-Droid: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/
ClearURLs works with no issues.
Not all WebExtension APIs are supported in the Android version of Firefox at this time, but the developers are working on the missing features.
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#75anyone using this site that still uses chrome, why?
I recently moved back to a Chromium based browser (Edge). Even on a fairly powerful system (16 logi cores/4GHz) it's just noticeably faster. SPAs are actually usable again. Video decoding is hardware accelerated and I can now play 4k videos without every interaction with the browser lagging like crazy.
Firefox is great, theoretically. But even then, Mozilla keep making inane decisions - lately their plans to remove compact mode [0] were in the news. Why?!
[0] https://www.ghacks.net/2021/03/14/mozilla-plans-to-remove-th...
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#76No problem as long as it's available elsewhere, is it? As to popularity - this mere news will probably bring more new users than Google store did in quite a period of time.
Discoverability, trust, security, plus what the sibling comment says.
Discoverability also isn't a thing such extensions should seek. As soon as too many people discover it Google and others will invent a smarter way to spy.
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#77Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#78I would really like to uninstall chrome from my Android phone but it appears to be impossible. Am I missing something?
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
For some websites, I've discovered that setting utm_medium let me read their paywalled articles. So, they're not always useless ;)
Combine ClearURLs with Bypass Paywalls Clean, and you get the best of both worlds: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bypass-paywal... https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clea...
Re: Google Removed ClearURLs Extension from Chrome Web Store
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried, but I find each and every Google Search alternative lacking. I frequently have to hunt down some bug descriptions or other stuff related to coding and Google Search is really hard to beat. Even tried Bing, lol
I'm using ddg on all my devices for ~2 or 3 years now, and it is fine by my standards. YMMV, of course.
I’m glad ddg exists, and it’s nice to see them improving over time.